Suplemental Disconnects

Status
Not open for further replies.

AndyK

Member
Location
Decatur, IL, USA
What is the correct usage for this section of the NEC; my co-workers are labeling everyhing outside of a MCC Enclosure as a supplemental disconnecting means and I think this is an incorrect use of this section. According to our in-house code expert, he has determined that because it says it does not need to be readily accessible that there is no height limit nor is there a clearance requirement, is this true, I have never heard of such an interpertation. Please give me your views, I personally think it is in regards to equipment such as HVAC Units with breakers enclosed as part of the system and items similar, I do not feel it was intended that all devices such as disconnects located at motors be labeled as supplemental and not subject to clearance issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top