inspector23
Senior Member
- Location
- Temecula, CA
2014 NEC swimming pool bonding 680.26(B)(6)(a)
First off, I have not done a pool inspection since The Twin Towers went down, so I am trying to knock the rust off.
Not sure what I am missing here, but here is the way I am understanding this section.
The second sentence – (the very first sentence under this section simply states “Double-Insulated Water Pump Motors.”) The second sentence is self-explanatory, I believe. I understand it to mean if the pool motor is double insulated and installed correctly, then you simply run a solid # 8 conductor with enough extra length to reach the pump motor. But you do not connect it, you simply leave it there for future use in case a replacement pump motor which is not double insulated is installed, then this conductor should be connected to the replacement motor to equalize the potential voltage with the other bonded grid components of the pool.
The next sentence, as I understand it, states if there is no other connection between the bonding grid and the equipment system for the premises, then you take this same #8 solid conductor and now connect it to the EGC of the motor circuit.
Two things bother me is this scenario – 680.21(B) – by way of 680.21.(A) – states the EGC shall be minimum size #12. Cheaper pool pump motors often have #14 conductors in their attached cords. (At least by my research via the internet).
Let’s say the initial motor is double-insulated, and the #8 bonding conductor is therefore connected to the EGC of the motor circuit. Now the motor is replaced for some reason, and the replacement is not a double insulated motor. My concern is the replacement motor may not have a bonding lug on it, so it may not get attached.
I know the code is a living thing, constantly evolving and chasing technology. I also know the code could not possibly address future scenarios.
I am just reaching out to others to see if I am missing anything on this subject prior to an upcoming pool inspection.
Thanks in advance for your help. And I always want to thank Mike Holt for his monetary commitment to founding this website and to the moderators for their time commitment to ensuring the professionalism of our trade is maintained. This trade has provided me and my family with a good living, and provided me with a sense of pride in my chosen profession.
First off, I have not done a pool inspection since The Twin Towers went down, so I am trying to knock the rust off.
Not sure what I am missing here, but here is the way I am understanding this section.
The second sentence – (the very first sentence under this section simply states “Double-Insulated Water Pump Motors.”) The second sentence is self-explanatory, I believe. I understand it to mean if the pool motor is double insulated and installed correctly, then you simply run a solid # 8 conductor with enough extra length to reach the pump motor. But you do not connect it, you simply leave it there for future use in case a replacement pump motor which is not double insulated is installed, then this conductor should be connected to the replacement motor to equalize the potential voltage with the other bonded grid components of the pool.
The next sentence, as I understand it, states if there is no other connection between the bonding grid and the equipment system for the premises, then you take this same #8 solid conductor and now connect it to the EGC of the motor circuit.
Two things bother me is this scenario – 680.21(B) – by way of 680.21.(A) – states the EGC shall be minimum size #12. Cheaper pool pump motors often have #14 conductors in their attached cords. (At least by my research via the internet).
Let’s say the initial motor is double-insulated, and the #8 bonding conductor is therefore connected to the EGC of the motor circuit. Now the motor is replaced for some reason, and the replacement is not a double insulated motor. My concern is the replacement motor may not have a bonding lug on it, so it may not get attached.
I know the code is a living thing, constantly evolving and chasing technology. I also know the code could not possibly address future scenarios.
I am just reaching out to others to see if I am missing anything on this subject prior to an upcoming pool inspection.
Thanks in advance for your help. And I always want to thank Mike Holt for his monetary commitment to founding this website and to the moderators for their time commitment to ensuring the professionalism of our trade is maintained. This trade has provided me and my family with a good living, and provided me with a sense of pride in my chosen profession.