allenwayne said:
A switch is required on each landing where there are 6 or more risers but nothing says it has to be a 3 way or 4 way or single pole.I think anyone would wire a 3 way in that case but then again some will say if not on the print it gets a single pole and thats it.
Kind of like a switch for exterior lighting some say it has to be at the door but the nec says it has to be there and that means anywhere.
james wuebker said:
Throwing a curve here. I know the 210.70 rules and understand. Let's say I have 2 light fixtures going up the stairs (12 steps). I have a light switch at the bottom of the steps for one light fixture and at the top of the stairs I have another light switch controlling the other fixture. Am I within the code here? I wouldn't ever think about doing it this way but you never know about some people.
Jim
210.70(A)(2)(c) "
Where one or more lighting outlet(s) are installed for interior stairways, there shall be a wall switch at each floor level, and landing level that includes an entryway, to control the lighting outlet(s) where the stairway between floor levels has six risers or more."
If the intent of this sentence was to provide single pole control for each stairway landing rather than for the stair treads themselves, the sentence would have said something like, "
Where one or more lighting outlet(s) are installed for interior stairway landings, there shall be a wall switch at each floor level, and landing level that includes an entryway, to control each of the lighting outlet(s)."
And the part about
counting stair treads wouldn't be included because it wouldn't matter. You would have to turn on the upper landing light with the upper single pole, get a look at the stairs, memorize as much as you can, and then turn the single pole back off and walk [or fall] down the stairs in the dark. When you get to the bottom, you turn on the
lower landing light with the bottom single pole [if you're injuries from the fall don't prevent it], get your first look at that house level [and any blood you might have to clean up], and then turn the single pole back off and proceed in the dark.
Everybody has to remember that a single pole can be turned on and left on in an occupied room, but when you're
traveling thru a hallway, stairway, or other area, a single pole isn't worth a damn. You can't illuminate a travel path with single poles unless you leave the lights on permanently.
When a inspector representing the AHJ makes an interpretation of the code [90.4], the most important thing for him to do is to try to understand the
intent of the wording in dispute. For 210.70(A)(2)(c), the intent is clear.
1) You have to count the number of stair treads to determine how to apply the rule.
2) The blue lettered commentary in the Handbook says this, "Section 210.70 points out that adequate lighting and proper control and location of switching are as essential to the safety of occupants of dwelling units, hotels, motels, and so on, as are proper wiring requirements. Proper illumination ensures safe movement for persons of all ages, thus preventing many accidents."
Safe movement and
preventing accidents can not be accomplished by forcing all occupants to travel stairs without lighting.
3) Common sense also guides interpretation. Noone should imagine that a code panel member would intend that stairways be travel in the dark and yet specify that landings be lit with single pole controls that prevent illumination while traveling on the stairs.
David