mshields
Senior Member
- Location
- Boston, MA
The second row of Table 300.5 is; In trench below 2 inches thick concrete or equivalent.
Column 3 is Nonmetallic Raceways Listed for Direct Burial without concrete encasement or other approved Raceways.
I've always thought it was strange that there is no column for Nonmetallic Raceways WITH concrete encasement insofar as this is a very common practice. Any insights as to why there is no such column
And related to that what about that second row category indicating that the depths in that row are for any one of the Wiring Methods under 2 inches of concrete. I have always assumed that this is referring to a slab above the conduit. BUT if you have a ductbank with a minimum of 2 inches beyond the conduits, clearly the conduit has 2 inch concrete above it. Granted, it has 2 inches of concrete below it, to the right, to the left, etc etc etc. Is this in fact the row that ought to be used for a traditional Sched 40 PVC duct bank with 2 inches of concrete all around?
Thanks,
Mike
Column 3 is Nonmetallic Raceways Listed for Direct Burial without concrete encasement or other approved Raceways.
I've always thought it was strange that there is no column for Nonmetallic Raceways WITH concrete encasement insofar as this is a very common practice. Any insights as to why there is no such column
And related to that what about that second row category indicating that the depths in that row are for any one of the Wiring Methods under 2 inches of concrete. I have always assumed that this is referring to a slab above the conduit. BUT if you have a ductbank with a minimum of 2 inches beyond the conduits, clearly the conduit has 2 inch concrete above it. Granted, it has 2 inches of concrete below it, to the right, to the left, etc etc etc. Is this in fact the row that ought to be used for a traditional Sched 40 PVC duct bank with 2 inches of concrete all around?
Thanks,
Mike
Last edited by a moderator: