Table 430.7(B) vs 430.251(B)

Status
Not open for further replies.

yesterlectric

Senior Member
Location
PA
Occupation
Electrician
I know this has been discussed but in searches it seems it hasn't been answered. The difference between table 430.7(B) and 430.251(B). I want to state what I think is the intention and then state what I think they should do to the NEC to clarify.

One confusing thing is that the table has a range of given KVA per HP, but you are always supposed to select the max. However, 430.7B (not the table) states that the motor locked current code shall comply with the table. So it seems that the NEC is making a construction specification for motors. If this is what they are doing, it would seem they should move that to a separate section for construction specifications. For wiring methods, that is always at the end of an article.

Secondly, there's the general rule in 430.52 stating that the branch circuit short circuit ground fault device should be capable of carrying the starting current of the motor. Since table 430.251B says it's ONLY for use with 430.110 (disconnects not short circuit ground fault devices) then one would need to use table 430.7 for guidance. If you want to size an inverse time breaker less than 250% of the FLA, then you might want to look at that table (as well as the circuit breaker tcc curve) to determine if it could be a problem. I suggest a change to 430.52 as well to clarify this. I think they should put an Informational Note below 430.52 stating that table 430.7 has information on locked rotor current of motors. Putting it an an IN would help keep the 430.52 as a general performance rule (the device must be capable of carrying the starting current). This way you won't have an inspector coming and failing an inspection because the breaker wasn't sized per 430.7; and also you wouldn't have someone sizing a breaker per what they think would work based on 430.7, have a tripping breaker, and saying "well it was code compliant."

In summary, I think they should do 2 things:
1. They should create a construction specifications section at the end of article 430 like they do everywhere, and move table 430.7B to that.
2. They should put an Informational Note at section 430.52 to state that table 430.7 has information on locked rotor current.
 
Last edited:

tom baker

First Chief Moderator & NEC Expert
Staff member
Location
Bremerton, Washington
Occupation
Master Electrician
The they should be you. Make a public input to change art 430. You have time as it will be for the 2026 edition. You will need technical reasons why.
 

yesterlectric

Senior Member
Location
PA
Occupation
Electrician
The they should be you. Make a public input to change art 430. You have time as it will be for the 2026 edition. You will need technical reasons why.

I thought you had to wait until they actually put out a request for proposals for the next version of the NEC before you can contribute. It's not easy always to contribute to the next development when you only have something like 9 months after the newest NEC version comes out, see if it addresses a prior issue or creates a new one, then make a proposal. In many cases most states haven't even adopted the new version when the deadline is up.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
I thought you had to wait until they actually put out a request for proposals for the next version of the NEC before you can contribute. It's not easy always to contribute to the next development when you only have something like 9 months after the newest NEC version comes out, see if it addresses a prior issue or creates a new one, then make a proposal. In many cases most states haven't even adopted the new version when the deadline is up.
The PIs for the 2026 NEC will be due sometime in mid September of 2023. The the NFPA site should be open for 2026 PIs sometime in October of 2022.
Everything will be done online as it has been for the 2020 and 2023 code cycles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top