Re: TELEPHONE CABLE
When he said that it ?was code,? there are two ways you could interpret that statement. One way (the way he probably hoped you would interpret it) is to mean that code requires it. The other way (the way he probably hoped you would not notice) is to mean that code does not forbid it. Generally, if the NEC does not explicitly forbid something, then we can infer that it is allowed. The truth is that what he did was allowed. It was not required, but it was allowed.
You can complain if you wish, but it is going to come down to money. If he did what at least the minimum of what he was contracted and paid to do, then someone is going to have to pay him again, if they want it redone some other way.
Best of luck from a current North West US resident who is proud to be a native of San Antonio.