Twoskinsoneman
Senior Member
- Location
- West Virginia, USA NEC: 2020
- Occupation
- Facility Senior Electrician
Ok I have seen several comments that conductor temps are limited to equipment temp limits even if the terminals on such equipment are allowed to be higher. (example 90 degree terminal on 75 degree device/equipment).
Why is that? My understanding is that the heat produced by 90 degree wire at full ampacity is ok for the conductor insulation but not necessarily ok for the terminal. The terminal can be adversly affected by the heat of the conductor... But why would that affect the equipment/device in general? Is the idea that the heat might tranfer from the terminal to the device and adversly affect it?
BTW I agree 110.14(C) supports this... I'm not asking about code but actual reasoning behind it.
Why is that? My understanding is that the heat produced by 90 degree wire at full ampacity is ok for the conductor insulation but not necessarily ok for the terminal. The terminal can be adversly affected by the heat of the conductor... But why would that affect the equipment/device in general? Is the idea that the heat might tranfer from the terminal to the device and adversly affect it?
BTW I agree 110.14(C) supports this... I'm not asking about code but actual reasoning behind it.