curt swartz
Electrical Contractor - San Jose, CA
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor
I?m going to be pulling a 200 amp feeder about 400? between 2 buildings. I was originally thinking of using 4/0 CU but now considering going with 350 AL. The line end will be a 225AF/200AT amp breaker located in a 400 amp panel board. The load end will be a 400AF/225AT enclosed breaker serving only as a service disconnect at the building being supplied.
The lugs on the breaker at the load end can easily handle the 350 AL conductors since it is a 400 amp frame breaker. The supply breakers lugs are rated for up to 300 kcmil.
The problem I have is my 350?s are technically too large for the 300 kcmil lugs. In reality since the aluminum conductors are compact conductors they are actually smaller in diameter that standard 300 kcmil conductors so would easily fit in the lugs.
I have 2 options.
(1) Install some Polaris connectors or = in the panel with a short section of smaller wire to connect to the breaker.
(2) Cheat and just terminate the 350?s directly on to the breaker since they will easily fit and I don?t see a real hazard.
I?m just curious to get the opinion of what others would do in this case. The first option is the only one that is really compliant but it is adding 2 additional connection points plus the additional cost.
The lugs on the breaker at the load end can easily handle the 350 AL conductors since it is a 400 amp frame breaker. The supply breakers lugs are rated for up to 300 kcmil.
The problem I have is my 350?s are technically too large for the 300 kcmil lugs. In reality since the aluminum conductors are compact conductors they are actually smaller in diameter that standard 300 kcmil conductors so would easily fit in the lugs.
I have 2 options.
(1) Install some Polaris connectors or = in the panel with a short section of smaller wire to connect to the breaker.
(2) Cheat and just terminate the 350?s directly on to the breaker since they will easily fit and I don?t see a real hazard.
I?m just curious to get the opinion of what others would do in this case. The first option is the only one that is really compliant but it is adding 2 additional connection points plus the additional cost.