James L
Senior Member
- Location
- Kansas Cty, Mo, USA
- Occupation
- Electrician
That would be a tie for first placeI can't recall where I saw it recently, but I saw a statement something along the lines that insulators will be made of a non-conductive material.
Paul Bunyan used an AXIt reminds me of when I was a kid our family was in a restaurant named Paul Bunyan when we were on vacation. We noticed there was a plaque under a long glass case that had a saw in it, so we got up from our meal to check out whether it had some historical or other significance. The engraved brass plaque said "Two Man Saw" with the explanation below "Used by two men to saw wood in old days." Well that was a waste of time while our meals were getting cold.
For Paul Bunyan it was a two-handed saw.It reminds me of when I was a kid our family was in a restaurant named Paul Bunyan when we were on vacation. We noticed there was a plaque under a long glass case that had a saw in it, so we got up from our meal to check out whether it had some historical or other significance. The engraved brass plaque said "Two Man Saw" with the explanation below "Used by two men to saw wood in old days." Well that was a waste of time while our meals were getting cold.
Lmao! Why didn't I ever notice this. Gotta love the code panel.334.100
The outer cable sheath of nonmetallic sheathed cable shall be made of nonmetallic material
If the sheath wasn't made from nonmetallic material, it wouldn't be nonmetallic sheathed.
I feel dumber for having read that
I once saw something that looked like NM cable, but the sheath was lead. It was buried, going from a house to a detached garage. It came up into a switch box in the garage, the rest of the wiring in the garage was BX.If they did not require the sheath to be NM it would not be NM sheathed cable.
People might make it out of metal.
I can't recall where I saw it recently, but I saw a statement something along the lines that insulators will be made of a non-conductive material.
Exactly why we need a 50pg owner manual for a toaster or hair dryer.For every dumb rule (or law) codified in the books,
There was an even dumber event that made it necessary.
Would have been 1920s-1930s most likelyI once saw something that looked like NM cable, but the sheath was lead. It was buried, going from a house to a detached garage. It came up into a switch box in the garage, the rest of the wiring in the garage was BX.
Was that what they used for "UF" back 'then', whenever 'then' was?
Was that in Michigan?It reminds me of when I was a kid our family was in a restaurant named Paul Bunyan when we were on vacation. We noticed there was a plaque under a long glass case that had a saw in it, so we got up from our meal to check out whether it had some historical or other significance. The engraved brass plaque said "Two Man Saw" with the explanation below "Used by two men to saw wood in old days." Well that was a waste of time while our meals were getting cold.
It reminds me of when I was a kid our family was in a restaurant named Paul Bunyan when we were on vacation. We noticed there was a plaque under a long glass case that had a saw in it, so we got up from our meal to check out whether it had some historical or other significance. The engraved brass plaque said "Two Man Saw" with the explanation below "Used by two men to saw wood in old days." Well that was a waste of time while our meals were getting cold.
It was in Wisconsin. But apparently there are also cities in Maine, Michigan, and Minnesota that claim Paul Bunyan was born there.Was that in Michigan?
Those are only 10 pages per language thoughExactly why we need a 50pg owner manual for a toaster or hair dryer.
and listing standards.Yeah I have seen that before and always thought it was funny and dumb. another thing though: can we just get the construction specifications out of the code please? Don't we have product standards for that?
Sometimes rules that cover things that should be in the product (listing) standards are added to the code to drive the product standard to make a change. The opposite happens too, where a change in the product standard drives a change in the code.Yeah I have seen that before and always thought it was funny and dumb. another thing though: can we just get the construction specifications out of the code please? Don't we have product standards for that?
Yeah and I don't know if I like that. I don't like the idea of the NEC mingling in something like the construction of a panel board that is listed and has a product standard. It's none of their business IMO.Sometimes rules that cover things that should be in the product (listing) standards are added to the code to drive the product standard to make a change. The opposite happens too, where a change in the product standard drives a change in the code.