three phase sub panel wire sizing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

Determine the total load that the feeder will serve, use 310.16 (75? column) to size the conductors, provide proper overcurrent protection. Remember to add 25% to any continuous loads. The grounded conductor may be reduced to carry only the unbalanced load but may not be less than the required equipment grounding (bonding) conductors as sized by Table 250.122.
 
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

Bryan, this is a real question.

Why would I not simply choose conductors rated 200 amps or more and forget about the calculations?

Assuming this sub panel is protected by 200 amp OCP the smallest conductor allowed regardless of calculations will be 3/0 and the largest required conductor would be 3/0.

Edit - 3/0 CU

Am I missing something?

[ June 25, 2005, 09:52 AM: Message edited by: iwire ]
 
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

i also thought that 3/0 would be sufficient but..
is the neutral considered current carrying? looking @ 310.15(b)(4) i would say no.
this is being installed in conduit, so would derating be necessary and make the 4/0 proper?
 
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

also by looking @220.61(b) it refers to the unbalanced load in excess of 200amps. can i really downsize the neutral?

[ June 25, 2005, 10:29 AM: Message edited by: ron b ]
 
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

Originally posted by iwire: Why would I not simply choose conductors rated 200 amps or more and forget about the calculations? . . . Am I missing something?
You are not. I agree with you.

However, I recently reviewed a design in which all of the sub-panels (large building, there were a bunch of panels) were 225 amp, regardless of the load. There might be a 50 amp OCPD and 50 amp feeder conductors, but the panel was shown as 225 amps. If this had been an early stage in the design, I might have guessed that this was just a way of showing that a panel is needed, with the actual ratings to be determined later. But it was a final design. My review comments included this issue, of course, and I can only suspect that someone?s brother-in-law has a warehouse full of 225 amp panels he wanted to offload. ;)

The point is that you only need to size the feeder for the calculated load. Anything beyond that is a design choice.
 
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

Originally posted by charlie b:
However, I recently reviewed a design in which all of the sub-panels (large building, there were a bunch of panels) were 225 amp, regardless of the load. There might be a 50 amp OCPD and 50 amp feeder conductors, but the panel was shown as 225 amps.
That would drive me nuts. :roll:

IMO it would take unusual circumstances to justify a panel at all with only a 50 amp OCP. Run the circuits to another panel location.

What a waste of labor and material. :roll:
 
Re: three phase sub panel wire sizing

i also thought that 3/0 would be sufficient but..
is the neutral considered current carrying? looking @ 310.15(b)(4) i would say no.
this is being installed in conduit, so would derating be necessary and make the 4/0 proper?
The neutral would only be a current carrying conductor if a major portion of the load was non-linear. At that point derating would apply. Otherwise the 3/0 that iwire suggested would be fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top