As stated the number of tandems in a panel would be related to the type of panel bought. For instance, you can have a panel that will accept 20 full size breaker or 40 twins (same as 20 piggybacks or tandem breakers). Either scenario will give a max of 40 circuits.Trying to find the number of twin breakers I can install in a 120v lighting panel. Is there some code limitation? Any references would greatly appreciated.
If I am understanding you.
Their is no limit to the number of breakers. It's based on the load.
However most panels don't exceed 42 as of now.
But, that wouldn't apply to existing equipment.There are Sq D 40 ckt panels that allow 20 tandems for a total of 60 circuits on the market now.
Off hand I would say Article 110. If you look at 110.3(A)(1)FPN : Suitability of equipment use may be identified by a description marked on or provided with a product to identify the suitability of the product for a specific purpose, environment, or application. Suitability of equipment may be evidenced by listing or labeling.You stated it could be a code violation...what section of the code would be refering to?
You weren't working on the existing panel. I would have added a sub-panel and told the inspector that it wasn't within the scope of the work being done to change out the existing panelOff hand I would say Article 110. If you look at 110.3(A)(1)FPN : Suitability of equipment use may be identified by a description marked on or provided with a product to identify the suitability of the product for a specific purpose, environment, or application. Suitability of equipment may be evidenced by listing or labeling.
I have failed an inspection on an installation like this once before. I had to add a 20 amp SABC to a remodeled kitchen. The HO had an older Sq-D-QO breaker panel with numerous tandem breakers already installed. So I added one of my own. When the inspector came out and looked at the panel all he said was "Get a manufacturer's document stating that it is acceptable to to install all these tandems in this panel". Long story-short I had to change out the HO's panel at his expense. More work and more $$ for me.![]()
I changed out the whole breaker panel and made the whole installation right and safe. Installing a sub-panel onto something that was already botched up was not an option. Besides, I got paid for the work anyway.You weren't working on the existing panel. I would have added a sub-panel and told the inspector that it wasn't within the scope of the work being done to change out the existing panel![]()
I got the impression from the OP that this was for an existing panel. Why plan for tandems in a new installation?Ok, and?![]()
I don't see how the load matters.
You must know my kidsAin't that like saying 'I can't be out of money, I still have blank checks'?
I got the impression from the OP that this was for an existing panel. Why plan for tandems in a new installation?
Ain't that like saying 'I can't be out of money, I still have blank checks'?:grin:
This is the statement I was referring to...So if I have a 40 circuit 200 amp panel I don't not have to be concerned with the total load only that it will hold 40 breakers?
Their is no limit to the number of breakers. It's based on the load.
However most panels don't exceed 42 as of now.