mikewillnot
Member
- Location
- Rochester, NY
- Occupation
- electrical contractor
Existing outbuilding [barn, really] with underground feeder (unknown size) from main house, to older panel "A" in a relatively inaccessible location in a pool equipment "room." Very sketchy.
New addition to back of outbuilding. GC wants new feeder to building, with a properly installed new sub/panel "B" supplying the addition plus ...
Does NEC require that the original feeder be killed?
If so, then I open a large can of worms. The pool equipment panel wlll need to be relocated/replaced and reconfigured as sub-panel -- or just removed and all the branch circuits spliced into the new panel, in which case I could become entangled in whether the branch circuits are properly set up for the pool equipment. The potential for "job creep" is enormous.
I would very much prefer to leave the existing stuff alone, and just be responsible for the new work. If possible.
Opinions please? THANKS
New addition to back of outbuilding. GC wants new feeder to building, with a properly installed new sub/panel "B" supplying the addition plus ...
Does NEC require that the original feeder be killed?
If so, then I open a large can of worms. The pool equipment panel wlll need to be relocated/replaced and reconfigured as sub-panel -- or just removed and all the branch circuits spliced into the new panel, in which case I could become entangled in whether the branch circuits are properly set up for the pool equipment. The potential for "job creep" is enormous.
I would very much prefer to leave the existing stuff alone, and just be responsible for the new work. If possible.
Opinions please? THANKS