Chan
Member
- Location
- Trinidad and Tobago
I was following this thread http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=58879
Where it was posted by rbalex that The "critical" element is the terminations - not the cable.
In what way?
I am aware of some offshore installations that use alot of none-textile hardening tape, such as denso, on cable entries into devices, lights is what way can this affect Class 1 Div 1 and @ installations other that the obvious prevention of breathing in the event the device is called upon to contain and explosion.
I am very curious to hear some opinions on these pictures attached some installations I came across that are similar to that I am dealing with. I am interested in finding out the violations to API RP 15 code and NFPA 70 as far as the visual on these pictures go....
Can the types of cable be determined to be Type MC-HL just by visual on these pictures
Where it was posted by rbalex that The "critical" element is the terminations - not the cable.
In what way?
I am aware of some offshore installations that use alot of none-textile hardening tape, such as denso, on cable entries into devices, lights is what way can this affect Class 1 Div 1 and @ installations other that the obvious prevention of breathing in the event the device is called upon to contain and explosion.
I am very curious to hear some opinions on these pictures attached some installations I came across that are similar to that I am dealing with. I am interested in finding out the violations to API RP 15 code and NFPA 70 as far as the visual on these pictures go....
Can the types of cable be determined to be Type MC-HL just by visual on these pictures