Ufer for seperately derived system

Status
Not open for further replies.

Danielt

Member
Location
VIRGINIA
Occupation
Master Electrician
I have a new remote structure, fed from the main building, on a concrete pad. The contractor ran 480v, then a wp step down transformer to 120/208 and a new panel. Two new ground rods were added. Should there have been a ufer because it's a separately derived system?
 
Is this a new pad? Or existing? If new, they should have installed it before it was poured, (assuming enough rebar of the correct size) or turned up a piece of rebar inside. If existing, it is not required to break the concrete to attach. If existing, the two ground rods are sufficient.
 
I have a new remote structure, fed from the main building, on a concrete pad. The contractor ran 480v, then a wp step down transformer to 120/208 and a new panel. Two new ground rods were added. Should there have been a ufer because it's a separately derived system?
Welcome to the forum.

There should be an electrode (system) because it's a separate structure and because it's an SDS.

An Ufer is one type of electrode, but it must be in a reinforced footing to qualify, not just a pad.

In my pinion, the two rods are adequate. You do have a local disconnecting means, don't you?
 
Welcome to the forum.

There should be an electrode (system) because it's a separate structure and because it's an SDS.

An Ufer is one type of electrode, but it must be in a reinforced footing to qualify, not just a pad.

In my pinion, the two rods are adequate. You do have a local disconnecting means, don't you?
There is a disconnect, and I agree the ground rods are sufficient. After all, it is still bonded back to the main building also.
It's only a 6 inch pad, but it does have rebar..
I've been considering if a separately derived system , including generators where the ats switches the neutral, should have a ufer if available.
 
There is a disconnect, and I agree the ground rods are sufficient. After all, it is still bonded back to the main building also.
It's only a 6 inch pad, but it does have rebar..
Since it's just a transformer pad it cannot be used to make a CEE. The two ground rods would be sufficient to make a GES for the transformer.
 
it depends on AHJ. in fort worth you are required to have UFER ground (or CU plumbing) and a ground rod... two ground rods will not cut it.
That would be something that is not required by the NEC. Is that a written code amendment or just the way they want it done?
 
I have a new remote structure, fed from the main building, on a concrete pad. The contractor ran 480v, then a wp step down transformer to 120/208 and a new panel. Two new ground rods were added. Should there have been a ufer because it's a separately derived system?
I read it as:
Separate structure.
Feeder from main building.
Transformer out side of separate structure. He said "wp"
Transformer on concrete pad?
Separate structure on pad, no footing?
Type of structure, metal wood etc?(just curious on that on). May need equal potential plane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top