Understanding motor "Service Factor"

Status
Not open for further replies.

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
What exactly is "service factor"?

I was looking around for motors, and found this page.

https://files.clrwtr.com/userfiles/...ive/sew-eurodrive-energy-efficient-motors.pdf

Comparing the standard motors to the high efficiency motors, the high efficiency have higher service factors. But they seem to use more amps, which is confusing me.

I assume a higher service factor is desirable?
Make sure you are comparing FLA to FLA and not FLA to SFA. A motor running at SFA is doing more work than same motor running at FLA.

Also comparing amps alone doesn't give you the whole picture when it comes to energy consumed, efficiency and power factor also come into play.
 

gadfly56

Senior Member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Professional Engineer, Fire & Life Safety
The service factor is a multiplier that you tells you how much over the full load amps the motor can handle for short periods of time.

Is there a standard in the US for "short period of time"? In Canada the service factor is taken to be for an indefinite period.
 

Jraef

Moderator, OTD
Staff member
Location
San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer
And... “Service Factor” means nothing outside of North America. So a paper from SEW EUROdrive is not the place to look for that kind of information. IEC (European and Asian) designed motors are all the equivalent of what we would call “1.0 Service Factor” compared to NEMA designed motors, as well as being, for the most part, Class 10 which means they cannot handle an overload for the same amount of time.

In my opinion, understanding SF requires understanding how it is typically used.

Scenarios 1: Let’s say you want to build a machine powered by an AC induction motor. You know the torque you need and the speed you want, but it calculated out to be 8.47HP continuously. If you are the end user and you want the maximum life out of this machine, you select a 10HP motor, because the next size down is 7-1/2HP and that is too small. But if you are an ORM selling this machine and you need to be competitive against other lower cost suppliers, you select a 7-1/2HP that has a 1.15 SF, because it can be used at 8.625HP, albeit with an increased current draw, lower efficiency and a reduced lifespan. Years ago the NEMA design specs used to quantify some of these issues in terms of time frames, but that was removed and now they just vaguely refer to the use of the SF as “reducing life”. Here is the wording:
A motor operating continuously at any service factor greater than 1.0 will have a reduced life expectancy as compared to operating at its rated nameplate horsepower. Insulation life and bearing life can be reduced by the service factor load.
So for the OEM, so long as it outlasts their warranty, they use it. The end user is who bears the cost of the reduced life by having to replace it sooner.

Scenario 2: the machine needs 6HP most of the time, but occasionally there is a change in the load and the motor is loaded down to 8.47HP for a few minutes, then returns to normal for a while longer, enough time for it to safely dissipate that extra heat. A common example is an air compressor that runs continuously but an unloader valve cycles on and off as the demand for air changes with shop use. When the unloader closes, the compressor loads the motor more heavily until the pressure is satisfied and the unloader opens again, venting the compression chamber to atmosphere. In that case, the 7-1/2HP motor makes sense.
 

retirede

Senior Member
Location
Illinois
I come from the industrial air compressor industry. The entire industry in the US designs their machines to utilize 10% of the 15% service factor. This allows the rated cfm to be as high as possible.

The life of a motor depends on many things....ambient temp, applied voltage, voltage imbalance....not just load.

Back when I was in the business, the design life of a NEMA motor loaded to full service factor was 10 years. As long as the voltage was exactly nameplate, imbalance was zero, ambient temp not exceeded, etc.

In real life applications, loading a motor into the service factor works. Would the motor last longer if only loaded to nameplate? Sure.

If you have an application that will consistently be at rated ambient, low and/or unbalanced voltage and constant load, I would expect that loading into the service factor will result in noticeably shorter motor life.
 

Jraef

Moderator, OTD
Staff member
Location
San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Occupation
Electrical Engineer

Yeah, I like it. It delves more into the issue of "service conditions" than I did above, meaning that the SF is also there for the "less than perfect" conditions such as line voltage fluctuations, high ambient etc. etc. So if you run a motor into the SF loading constantly, you have consumed that margin of safety for those sub-optimal conditions, which in truth represent the real world.
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
Beyond the additional losses, is there an error in the article?
Not so much errors as generalisations.
The 10°C increase in winding temperature reducing the life expectancy by 50%, for example, needs context. I’m disagreeing with it out of hand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top