dbwest
Member
- Location
- Washington, USA
- Occupation
- electrician
I am installing a barrel sauna in my backyard. Its 8 kW heater takes 240 V and is to be hardwired. The sauna also comes with an LED strip and an associated power supply, which takes 120 V and draws 0.35 A. The power supply has a male plug at the end of a flexible cord, but the sauna installation manual suggests that the power supply could be hardwired (the wires are 20 AWG). I have an installation in mind, but my electrical apprentice brain worries that there could be code violations.
I would like to install a two-pole 40 A breaker in my basement panel, from which I would pull two #8s to a disconnect on the side of my house. I would pull #10 ground to the disco. I would pull two #8s from the disco to the sauna, as well as the #10 ground and a #12 white from the panel. At the sauna, I would tap into one of the #8s with a #12 conductor leading to a 1 A in-line fuse, which would splice to the line side of the power supply's cord. I would splice the load side of the power supply cord to the #12 white. This arrangement affords me a few things: 1) only one multiwire branch circuit makes its way to the the sauna, so I wouldn't have to ground the structure per 250.32(A) exception; 2) I can take advantage of 240.5(A)/240.10 in that the flexible cord can get protected by a supplementary OCPD. I'm also bearing in mind 210.19(A)(4) exception #2, I think.
I was worried about the implications of 400.12(1) with respect to the flexible cord being hardwired, but the sauna's installation manual gives it as a suggestion, so I figured it is OK. My main concern now is GFCI protection. The heater explicitly says that it is not to be GFCI protected, but I wonder if the power supply in my proposed circuit would require GFCI protection given that the box from which the cord emerges would be outside. I would like to mount a box on the back of the sauna from which sealtite would emerge to carry the 240 V to the heater; the power supply's cord would also emerge from this box via a weatherproof cord grip.
I would like to install a two-pole 40 A breaker in my basement panel, from which I would pull two #8s to a disconnect on the side of my house. I would pull #10 ground to the disco. I would pull two #8s from the disco to the sauna, as well as the #10 ground and a #12 white from the panel. At the sauna, I would tap into one of the #8s with a #12 conductor leading to a 1 A in-line fuse, which would splice to the line side of the power supply's cord. I would splice the load side of the power supply cord to the #12 white. This arrangement affords me a few things: 1) only one multiwire branch circuit makes its way to the the sauna, so I wouldn't have to ground the structure per 250.32(A) exception; 2) I can take advantage of 240.5(A)/240.10 in that the flexible cord can get protected by a supplementary OCPD. I'm also bearing in mind 210.19(A)(4) exception #2, I think.
I was worried about the implications of 400.12(1) with respect to the flexible cord being hardwired, but the sauna's installation manual gives it as a suggestion, so I figured it is OK. My main concern now is GFCI protection. The heater explicitly says that it is not to be GFCI protected, but I wonder if the power supply in my proposed circuit would require GFCI protection given that the box from which the cord emerges would be outside. I would like to mount a box on the back of the sauna from which sealtite would emerge to carry the 240 V to the heater; the power supply's cord would also emerge from this box via a weatherproof cord grip.