Alwayslearningelec
Senior Member
- Location
- NJ
- Occupation
- Estimator
is it 180VA per duplex for 20A circuit or 15a? Or is it the same for either? Think it would be different. Thanks
I still disagree with that statement.. . . however more receptacles are permitted on a 20 amp circuit than on a 15 amp circuit.
Why has something changed with the code wording?I still disagree with that statement.
Isn't Art. 220 about load calculating and not actual installation?Why has something changed with the code wording?
![]()
210.20(A) requires the branch circuit OCPD be at least the calculated load (with 125% continuous use modifier). So in a situation where each receptacle is to be calculated at 1.5A (180VA), and the OPCD is 15A, having more than 10 receptacles on that circuit violates 210.20(A).Isn't Art. 220 about load calculating and not actual installation?
You seem to be conflating "load" with "utilization equipment." While it would be better if the NEC explicitly stated this somewhere (e.g. via a definition in Article 100), it is implicit that whenever the NEC uses the bare noun "load" it is referring to a number determined by following Article 220's procedure. Where the NEC wants to refer to a piece of equipment, it uses the term "utilization equipment." [Did not check every 1300+ uses of the word "load" in the 2017 NEC, it's possible there are some exceptions, which I would view as mistakes.]Again, I disagree. The word 'calculated' does not appear in 210.20(A).
A receptacle is not a load. A calculated load is not a load.
No, I'm distinguishing between the rules for calculating circuits, feeders, and services vs those for actual wiring and installations.You seem to be conflating "load" with "utilization equipment."
(I) Receptacle Outlets. Except as covered in 220.14(J) and220.10 covers calculating branch circuit loads and refers you to 220.12, 220.14, and 220.16. 220.14 covers "other loads--all occupancies". 220.14(I) covers "Receptacle Outlets". It says that, other than as covered in (J) Dwelling Units and (K) Office Buildings, the load per receptacle is 180VA per yoke.
If so, it would be way too easy to have an article that says: "The quantity of receptacle outlets permitted on one circuit shall not exceed the quantity in Table X.XX."So in a building other than a dwelling unit or an office building, a branch circuit supplying 11 general use duplex receptacles (not for specific utilization equipment, which would be covered under 220.14(A)) has a load of 1950 VA. 210.20(A) would therefore require an OCPD larger than 15A.
OK, but the rule for actual wiring (210.20(A)) refers to the value calculated. That's what the word "load" means.No, I'm distinguishing between the rules for calculating circuits, feeders, and services vs those for actual wiring and installations
You could try saying that they are all for a specific load, so fall under 220.14(A), and then you wouldn't be stuck with 220.14(I)'s 180VA per receptacle.Supposed I wired an office building, and decided on twenty hallway receptacles for the single floor buffer that the custodian will run down each hallway. What says I can't wire them all on one circuit?
Is that MAXing out circuit? Would you put 80% of that qty on circuit?Why has something changed with the code wording?
![]()
In the case of the picture. Yes, maxing out the circuit. No, you would not apply continuous load rule in this case.Is that MAXing out circuit? Would you put 80% of that qty on circuit?