No it will not meet the requirement. I work with some 647 applications using a UPS. The reason for the tight VD tolerance with 647 qpplications is the lower voltage nature of the 120/60 systems and over current protection devices. By keeping the VD to 2.5% or less means the circuit cunductors are very low impedance, especially the EGC path under fault conditions. It really comes down to ohm's-law of E/R=I. Since E=60 as measured to ground, R has to alao be low to ensure I will be high during a fault to trip the OCPDSam.Ying said:According to NEC 647.4(D) the total voltage drop for sensitive electronic equipment shall not exceed 2.5 %
But if all equipment is supplied by a UPS, will a VD near 5 % than be in accordance with the NEC?
If not?. Than I am confused!!
Thanks,
Sam
dereckbc said:Since E=60 as measured to ground
dereckbc said:By keeping the VD to 2.5% or less means the circuit cunductors are very low impedance, especially the EGC path under fault conditions.
No I did not say it wrong, you are missing something, 647 applications are 120/60 systems, there is no grounded circuit conductor (neutral), only two hot conductors plus ground. Each hot conductor is 60 VAC to ground and 120 L-L. Think of it like a single phase 240 circuit L1-L2=240, L-G=120.Physis 3 said:E=60? Did you say that wrong or am I missing something?
Physis 3 said:I also have to ask why the EGC would be considered more important with sensitive equipment. "especially the EGC path under fault conditions"? If this were true there'd actually be a requirement for a larger EGC. I know that you know the EGC can be smaller and still work fine to clear a fault because it happens so fast.
Sam.Ying said:All right, now I know.
This article 647 has no relevance to me at all, because I have a 3 phases/4wire system.