throwaway1
Member
- Location
- usa
Good morning everyone!
I have measurements from an electrician that measured 0.93V at the metal light casing and 0.33V at the metal handrail with their buildings and equipment in service. When they turned off their buildings in the perimeter and pool equipment, there was 0.62V at the light casing and 0.02V at the handrail. If this was grounded and equipotentially bonded, why is there still approximately 0.61V difference in voltage between the light and the hand rail? Shouldn't they both be the same voltage with reference to deck?
A couple of years ago, all of the primary equipment was replaced and the customer says it fixed the issue. A couple of years later they said it came back. What would have changed on the primary side? The residents of the pool have complained of a shocking sensation near the light.
I have measurements from an electrician that measured 0.93V at the metal light casing and 0.33V at the metal handrail with their buildings and equipment in service. When they turned off their buildings in the perimeter and pool equipment, there was 0.62V at the light casing and 0.02V at the handrail. If this was grounded and equipotentially bonded, why is there still approximately 0.61V difference in voltage between the light and the hand rail? Shouldn't they both be the same voltage with reference to deck?
A couple of years ago, all of the primary equipment was replaced and the customer says it fixed the issue. A couple of years later they said it came back. What would have changed on the primary side? The residents of the pool have complained of a shocking sensation near the light.