Voltage Drop Distance

Status
Not open for further replies.

new_ee

Senior Member
When figuring voltage drop do you use an "as the crow flies" distance or do you use an actual run distance?
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

i see your point. it does make sense to figure it as and actual conductor run. but i could swear that i read somewhere that you figure the distance between the panel and the equipment without regard to the conductor run. maybe im losing it.
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

Perhaps it will help if you recall that limiting voltage drop is not an NEC requirement. It is a design consideration only.

You can start with a quick estimate of the distances from panel to load, without calculating the distance along the exact routing. This would give you a general idea of the amount of VD. If you could quickly tell, for example, that the VD is somewhere in the order of 1% to 2%, you do not need to get a more precise answer. It is not important to know that the VD is "exactly" 1.734%. If you know that VD is well below 3%, you can walk away from that question.

On the other hand, if your quick estimate tells you the VD is on the order of 2.5% to 3.5%, you might want to do a more precise calculation. It may be important to learn whether the VD is above or below 3%, because it may influence your choices of wire sizes.
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

CharlieB.... I do believe there IS an article that states that VD must be within 3% on branch circuits. I will look for it and give you an article # if I can find it. If you read the archives you will see a problem I encountered with a "house inspector" on exactly this issue. The "house inspector" had a fancy $500.00 circuit tester that tested for >3% VD on a circuit, he called a circuit in a 1 year old house as "failed"the current test. Come to find out his $500.00 checker was doing a VD test. It was a can of worms. Lou
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

I have a 208V/20A receptacle that is 520' away from the panelboard. Unfortunately this is the closest panelboard to the room needing this receptacle. The voltage drop calculations yield a #3 to achieve a 3% voltage drop. I know this is a bit ridiculous and not practical. I was thinking of using a buck/boost transformer at the load. However, does anyone else have any ideas?
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

Originally posted by gudguyham:
CharlieB.... I do believe there IS an article that states that VD must be within 3% on branch circuits.
You are refering to the FPN's to sections 210.19(A)(1) and 215.4. FPN's are not enforceable.
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

CharlieB.... I do believe there IS an article that states that VD must be within 3% on branch circuits.
Actually there isn't, but there is a FPN stating a recommended voltage drop of 3% or 5%. Take a look at 210.19(A)(1) FPN No. 4. FPN's are not enforceable.
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

Originally posted by BigMike:However, does anyone else have any ideas?
My calculation tells me that a #4 will get you a 3% VD. But the transformer at the other end is probably your best bet.

Do you know the actual load that this receptacle will be called upon to carry? For example, if you can justify saying that the load is limited to 14 amps, then you could use a #6.
 
Re: Voltage Drop Distance

Originally posted by BigMike:
I have a 208V/20A receptacle that is 520' away from the panelboard. Unfortunately this is the closest panelboard to the room needing this receptacle. The voltage drop calculations yield a #3 to achieve a 3% voltage drop. I know this is a bit ridiculous and not practical. I was thinking of using a buck/boost transformer at the load. However, does anyone else have any ideas?
Here's a solution
Mike Holt Forum
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top