autecbernie
Member
If I'm running a 200 amp service a distance of 400', do I still consider the voltage drop based on 200 amps at a 3% voltage drop or a 5% voltage drop
If he does that he will end up with something in the range of the 200 amp service. As it was pointed out that would be over kill.Why don't you calculate the load in accordance with Article 220 and base your voltage drop calculations on something solid. Or just flip a coin and take your chances. Guessing is
Just my opinion, but I disagree with this line of thinking somewhat. True, the panel is sized for future load growth, but the service conductors or feeders are not sized for future load growth. So it's like you're halfway there, I guess. But I guess most of the time upgrading components for future load growth is not required so its kind of a bonus for the customer. Ok I'm done being snipity.a 200 ampere service is usually an increment and not the result of actual calculations. If the calculated load is 110 amperes, a lot of people will just install a 200 ampere service to allow for future growth. Also, what size service would you set if your calculated load were 155 amperes?
I don?t agree with this recommended design approach.Originally posted by hardworkingstiff: Since we are talking about one of my favorite subjects, what is the opinion here of what an acceptable voltage drop is. I wire a lot of marinas . . . . What I have been recommending as a minimum is to size the wire so at 100% load on the circuit, the voltage drop is not more than 10% with the power company maintaining 240 volts.
So would I. But do keep in mind that that is a design choice, not a code requirement.Originally posted by james wuebker: If i'm going to put a 200 amp service in then the wire size should be good for 200 amps for the furture.