Did not feel like doing it earlier but here is the by-section sequence volt drop showing a total drop of 2.24853% using #14 and 100% power factor:
Section,amps,Type,Size,Section ft,Total ft,pf,Source,vd,Load,Section %,Total vd,Total %
1,2.7,Cu,14-1,20,20,1.0,120.0,0.34,119.7,0.28%,0.3,0.3%
2,2.4,Cu,14-1,40,60,1.0,119.7,0.59,119.1,0.49%,0.9,0.8%
3,2.0,Cu,14-1,40,100,1.0,119.1,0.51,118.6,0.42%,1.4,1.2%
4,1.7,Cu,14-1,40,140,1.0,118.6,0.42,118.1,0.36%,1.9,1.5%
5,1.4,Cu,14-1,40,180,1.0,118.1,0.34,117.8,0.29%,2.2,1.8%
6,1.0,Cu,14-1,40,220,1.0,117.8,0.25,117.6,0.21%,2.4,2.0%
7,0.7,Cu,14-1,40,260,1.0,117.6,0.17,117.4,0.14%,2.6,2.2%
8,0.3,Cu,14-1,40,300,1.0,117.4,0.08,117.3,0.07%,2.7,2.2%
or using the load center method:
Section,added amps,Total ft,section amp-ft,Total amp-ft
1,0.3,20,6.8,6.8
2,0.3,60,20.4,27.2
3,0.3,100,34.0,61.2
4,0.3,140,47.6,108.8
5,0.3,180,61.2,170.0
6,0.3,220,74.8,244.8
7,0.3,260,88.4,333.2
8,0.3,300,102.0,435.2
and 435.2/2.72 = 160 ft and
load center = 2.72 amps at 160 ft = 2.24853% with #14
And here is the volt drop using total amps and total distance (NOT the way to do it) showing a 4.216% drop:
Section,amps,Type,Size,Section ft,Total ft,pf,Source,vd,Load,Section %,Total vd,Total %
1,2.7,Cu,14-1,300,300,1.0,120.0,5.06,114.9,4.22%,5.1,4.2%