CenDes
Member
- Location
- Galveston, TX USA
Are there any code violations or concerns to using 277V for temporary lighting in a new high rise construction?
Is there something about the temporary installation that makes it unique?
Having a construction background I would advise against it.
Why?
1) if someone gets whacked by it the outcome is likely going to be worse.
2) The reason for using 277 is usally to install fewer circuits with more fixtures on each. This means when we have to shut it down to move or repair it we are putting more areas in the dark.
We use 120 volts with CFL lamps or 120 volt HID fixtures.
We use 120 volts with CFL lamps or 120 volt HID fixtures.
I would say temporary construction wiring is unique and much more likely to be damaged while energized.
There is nothing "unique" about the construction area or installation. Specifically the site is a new hospital facility in construction.
I have never seen a 480/277 temporary, but I have been out of the field for a long time.
Do you use them because you don't want to have 277 volt lighting for risk of exposure to 277 volts, or do you use them because 120 volts is almost always available at about any site?
Something else to consider is if it is temporary and part of a cord set with a cord cap - the 120 volt version will most likely be required to have GFCI protection on the receptacle. This will help with protecting people that encounter the cord or luminaires while working.
The 277 volt lighting will not have GFCI requirements whether cord and plug connected or not.
I do realize it says "Receptacles on construction sites shall not be installed on any branch circuit that supplies temporary lighting." in there.
I think that section needs more clarification, as a lot of cord and plug connected temporary lighting exists out there. Many of us have a cord and plug connected trouble light in our truck/van - isn't that a temporary light, and if so how can we ever use it without violating this section?