Water pipe supplemental grounding electrode(s)?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi All,
Had a discussion with the AHJ today.
He is under the impression that if I am using a municipal (metal) water pipe as my primary grounding electrode that I must install two supplemental ground rods according to 250.53.
I do not see it. The way I have always read it, it only requires one supplemental (grounding electrode) ground rod.
We need clarification on this please and thank you.
Dj
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Look a bit further in 250.53(D)(2)

(2) Supplemental Electrode Required. A metal underground
water pipe shall be supplemented by an additional electrode of
a type specified in 250.52(A)(2) through (A)(8). If the supplemental
electrode is of the rod, pipe, or plate type, it shall
comply with 250.53(A). The supplemental electrode shall be
bonded to one of the following...
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
There are some semantics involved here. You both might be correct. A single ground rod is not considered an electrode unless it's supplemented by another a electrode (can be a second rod) or if the single rod is proven to be 25 ohms or less.
 

winnie

Senior Member
Location
Springfield, MA, USA
Occupation
Electric motor research
And guess which is cheaper: proving a single rod has a resistance to distant earth less than 25 ohms, or simply driving a second rod.
 

LarryFine

Master Electrician Electric Contractor Richmond VA
Location
Henrico County, VA
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
I was told by an inspector on my second service change that I had to drive two rods because I was unable to ascertain that the existing water pipe was metallic and long enough to qualify as an electrode.

On another, more recent job, I was able to use a single existing rod because I was able to prove the new water pipe was metallic and long enough to qualify as an electrode:

DSC00229.JPG DSC00230.JPG DSC00231.JPG DSC00232.JPG
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
I was told by an inspector on my second service change that I had to drive two rods because I was unable to ascertain that the existing water pipe was metallic and long enough to qualify as an electrode.

On another, more recent job, I was able to use a single existing rod because I was able to prove the new water pipe was metallic and long enough to qualify as an electrode:

View attachment 2553516 View attachment 2553517 View attachment 2553518 View attachment 2553519
A single rod unless tested to prove that it's 25 ohms or less does not qualify as an electrode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top