Watertight Reducing Bushings

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm curious to hear opinions.
Inspector sees exterior EMT into exterior disconnect (happens to be PV system).
The EMT has watertight fittings, but apparently the disconnect got the wrong knockout knocked out, and the connector has reducing washers installed.
However, the reducing washers are not watertight. Now, I THINK it's hard to find watertight reducing washers, though I've only looked online (and only found one manufacturer).
In fact, if you were to re-route the EMT into a different hole, you'd have to plug the old hole, and I don't generally see watertight plugs. Or maybe you'd just have to get a new box. Seems extreme: this is just a NEMA 3 disconnect on the side of an IRC house, no special circumstances/unusual exposure.
I'd like to hear what people think. Thanks.
 
Use the correct size Meyers hub with an RE bushing.

Roger
 
I don't see an issue with standard reducing washers. 312.2 only requires fittings in entries above live parts to be wet location listed. You didn't say where the entry is, but if it started as a factory KO it will be below live parts. Even though a disconnect is probably covered in 404, 404.4(A) references 312.2.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top