RD35
Senior Member
- Location
- Bloomington, Indiana
Homeowner has a 400A 120/240V 1-phase service at his house. House panel is 200A. Shop (100 feet away) has 200A panel fed underground from the house. Each panel is fed from separate service CB Enclosures adjacent to the 400A meter base at the house. The homeowner wants to use a portable generator to feed two 200A whole-house manual transfer switches..one at the house and one at the shop...each next to their respective loadcenters. He wants this portable generator located out at the shop building. Portable has a 2P60A breaker on it. He wants to install (bury) a 60A feeder along side the 200A shop building feeder so he can feed power from the shop to the house manual transfer switch. He will also have some switch leg wires in the ditch as well for controlling lights from either building via a circuit originating in the shop. Is there a code violation hidden in this design somewhere?
Now....the thought plickens….He also wants to install additional u/g conduits so that he can (in the future) install a stationary automatic generator and two automatic 200A whole-house transfer switches adjacent to the two service disconnects at the house. These switches will feed the utility terminals of each of his manual transfer switch. So...yes....this guy will have (4) 200A transfer switches...2 auto and 2 manual. Do you all see anything alarming (code wise) about this design. I cannot find any violations so far....but it's so complicated I thought I'd post it up and see if any of you can spot a problem I am not seeing. Thanks
Now....the thought plickens….He also wants to install additional u/g conduits so that he can (in the future) install a stationary automatic generator and two automatic 200A whole-house transfer switches adjacent to the two service disconnects at the house. These switches will feed the utility terminals of each of his manual transfer switch. So...yes....this guy will have (4) 200A transfer switches...2 auto and 2 manual. Do you all see anything alarming (code wise) about this design. I cannot find any violations so far....but it's so complicated I thought I'd post it up and see if any of you can spot a problem I am not seeing. Thanks