Thanks. I was in hopes of finding some I had read earlier about individuals being shocked while near the well other than folks working on it, but that one may have to do.
Every time the subject comes up on an inspection I try to explain the need for the EGC return path. I thought a little anecdotal evidence might help.
250.4(A)(5) clearly points out that an effective ground fault path needs to be used, and the fact that Earth shall never be used as this path as it can not ever be depended upon to allow enough current to flow to open the OCPD, also take a look at 250.112 and look at (L) and (M) not only is the pump required to be connected to the EGC but the casing also.
(5) Effective Ground-Fault Current Path. Electrical
equipment and wiring and other electrically conductive material
likely to become energized shall be installed in a manner
that creates a low-impedance circuit facilitating the
operation of the overcurrent device or ground detector for
high-impedance grounded systems. It shall be capable of
safely carrying the maximum ground-fault current likely to be imposed on it from any point on the wiring system where a ground fault may occur to the electrical supply source. The
earth shall not be considered as an effective ground-fault
current path.
Point out that even if you could meet the 25 ohm minimum that the code allows that 120 volts divided by 25 ohms will only allow 4.8 amps of current to flow which would not even open a 5 amp fuse or breaker.
In the above link to the OSHA event we can see that even a well casing that was 120' deep did not provide a low enough impedance path to open the OCPD that fed this well and protect this worker. again the reason 250.4(A)(5) needs to be followed.
You should not have to educate an electrician when enforcing the code, although that article could enlighten them a little with some added words of what could happen if a person was hurt or killed because they didn't follow what the code says, that the fact they could be facing criminal judgments of man slaughter against them as many of us have seen and has been posted on here about.
And the fact they would have to live with the fact they cause a death to someone because they didn't want to follow the law, ask them what if it was a child in that article, would they be willing to live with that?
Invite them to the forum and we can explain why the Earth can not ever be use in place of a EGC.
This myth has been perpetuated over many years, and I find it many times coming from the utility side because they do use the Earth somewhat as a conductor, but it is not for fault current it is more to save on line loss and to allow smaller conductors to be used for the MGN, I have seen events that even at 7200 volts where the Earth would not open the primary line protective device, and a house (actually two) almost caught fire.
But I will point out that there are two errors in the OSHA article, one is that pump wire is an NEC and UL listed wiring method for wells (with an EGC of course) UF is not the only wiring method, and I have never heard of a copper sheath underground cable before? most of these pump wire cables are a 3 conductor red,black, and black with a green strip, for pumps with onboard starting caps, or red,black,yellow, and black with green stripe for ones with a control box that has the caps in it, for three phase pumps its BLK,RED,BLU,BLK/GRN ST., the installation sounds like the installer didn't have the correct cable for a 3-phase pump so they used the wires for a single phase pump with a control box without the EGC.
I believe these pump conductors have a UF listing as a single conductors and are listed under table 310.104 but I'm not sure about if this is correct or if they are listed as TW but I do know they are allowed.