Re: When is enough too much?
without defending the contractor's price, several comments on the other side (i could never charge that kind of money for a tripped breaker-but i had them try to not pay a service call fee when i told them what it was)
did the qualifying electrician (the setting up the sting) actually check out the panel for any other problems? He actually certified it as safe??
the contractor who turned on the breaker assumed the liability of the problem causing the tripped breaker.
I was on a remodel job where a fire broke out by the main panel. It was an old Zinsco and stuffed. I was just moving plugs, far from the old panel. The insurance company asked if any electricians had been near the panel and were going to go after whoever had touched it last. I had witnesses, otherwise??.
I know electricians that will not do old work.
the contractor up the street from me just dropped his liability insurance, himself and a crew of two, 30k. Didn't make that kind of extra money.
it seems the expose implied that it was OBVIOUS that there were no underlying problems.
did the expose explain any risks associated with assuming the breaker was at fault. Although I think the amount estimated was extremely high, not explaining any of the hazards assiociated with electrical work, or of trying to verify hidden problems, and the assumed liability, did a disservice to the electrical industry.
I would like to see them compare the estimate with the amount of pay they receive for their own time; for the electrician, possibly two service calls, at least a half hour to two hours checking circuit. (I have seen houses where an hour or more of moving furniture was expected, with liability for fagile antiques, just to get to a couple of outlets). Even if the electrician got the job, he would have been paid less than the news hypers.
There are so many bigger rip offs to go after, i doubt the news' integrity.
paul