josephacarter
New User
- Location
- St. louis, MO
- Occupation
- Electrical Engineer
I'm working on a Federal Government project. I've reviewed the UFC's and NEC. I can not find anything about what wire size or # of parallel feeders that "triggers" the use of a manhole instead of a handhole.
My application is 4 SETS of (4) 500KCMIL, (1) #3/0G, in 4"C, with (2) SPARE 4"C, concrete encased duct bank. No splices! It's a 450' feeder that has a 45 degree bend, then a 270 degree bend. The design calls for a hand hole at each bend. My project manager is telling me they have to be manholes.
NEC 314.30 size of the handhole directs you to NEC 314.28 which refers to "#4AWG or larger" which in my case #500's are larger.
UFC 3-550-01 EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION says "handholes can be sued for low-voltage" which applies; and "Do not use handholes for splicing shielded power cables" which does not apply.
The design is a year old and by a different engineer no longer with the company, nor reachable.
If there is any "rule of thumb" or "industry standard" telling me a manhole is the proper application, I'll change the design. Else, I don't see an issue with the design.
Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Joe
My application is 4 SETS of (4) 500KCMIL, (1) #3/0G, in 4"C, with (2) SPARE 4"C, concrete encased duct bank. No splices! It's a 450' feeder that has a 45 degree bend, then a 270 degree bend. The design calls for a hand hole at each bend. My project manager is telling me they have to be manholes.
NEC 314.30 size of the handhole directs you to NEC 314.28 which refers to "#4AWG or larger" which in my case #500's are larger.
UFC 3-550-01 EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION says "handholes can be sued for low-voltage" which applies; and "Do not use handholes for splicing shielded power cables" which does not apply.
The design is a year old and by a different engineer no longer with the company, nor reachable.
If there is any "rule of thumb" or "industry standard" telling me a manhole is the proper application, I'll change the design. Else, I don't see an issue with the design.
Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Joe