Which Temp Rating for Alum. URD ( xhhw )

Status
Not open for further replies.

KWH

Senior Member
I have a direct burial 4/0 al. urd 3 conductor cable for service entrance concerning amperage do you use the 60 or 75 degree table.

Thanks
 

jumper

Senior Member
Why 60C??? This is USE not SEU and it is used as service entrance . IMO 75C

338(A)(4)(b) Exterior Installations. In addition to the provisions
of this article, service-entrance cable used for feeders or
branch circuits, where installed as exterior wiring, shall be
installed in accordance with Part I of Article 225. The cable
shall be supported in accordance with 334.30. Type USE
cable installed as underground feeder and branch circuit
cable shall comply with Part II of Article 340.


340.80 Ampacity. The ampacity of Type UF cable shall be
that of 60?C (140?F) conductors in accordance with 310.15.
 

infinity

Moderator
Staff member
Location
New Jersey
Occupation
Journeyman Electrician
338(A)(4)(b) Exterior Installations. In addition to the provisions
of this article, service-entrance cable used for feeders or
branch circuits
, where installed as exterior wiring, shall be
installed in accordance with Part I of Article 225. The cable
shall be supported in accordance with 334.30. Type USE
cable installed as underground feeder and branch circuit
cable shall comply with Part II of Article 340.


340.80 Ampacity. The ampacity of Type UF cable shall be
that of 60?C (140?F) conductors in accordance with 310.15.

Is the application in the OP a feeder or branch circuit?
 

KWH

Senior Member
With being used as service entrance it is 75 degree correct

With being used as service entrance it is 75 degree correct

N/a
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Lol, I seriously wonder if the intent was to rate xxhw at 60C. I suspect it isn't but who knows. I am trying to understand why a feeder with 75C wire would only be 60C if it is in conduit-- it doesn't make sense.

Well we'll find out. I just wrote a proposal to exclude 340.80
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top