By definition I would agree with you. Installing an OCPD at the unit disconnect makes the conductors between the disco and the panel feeders. This has been a topic of debate on this forum before. It is because of this that we never install an OCPD next to the unit unless it required by the nameplate. From a contractors perspective unless it's in the spec, it's not needed and a waste of money.With a fused switch at the unit the conductors between the panel and the fused disconnect have to be protected at the conductor's ampacity, so that wire is sized to the breaker rating rather than to MCA. Other jurisdictions may have other interpretations....
AC units are rated by the manufacturer for their Minimum Circuit Ampacity (MCA) and their Maximum Fuse or Circuit Breaker size. The MCA rating, is for sizing the conductors feeding the unit. This number already has the 125% factored in to the MCA rating by the manufacturer so the ampacity that appears on the nameplate is the actual ampacity that you will use to size the conductors.I read that in mike holts book but cant seem to understand it been doing this for so many years #14 or #12 for an ac condensor baffles my brain I have allways sized acording to amperage, could you elaborate a little on this. tia
I would offer your very good explanation a slight correction. Our minimum OCPD would have to be based on the size listed on the unit, not the MCA.Originally posted by infinity:
THe OCPD can be any size between the MCA and Maximum OCPD rating on the nameplate.
Perhaps, but there are advantages to using a larger size wire, namely less voltage drop and less I^2*R losses.Originally posted by normbac:
Thanks for all replies, guess I have been oversizing ac condensors
Things are better, but not that much better. My 4 Ton 14 SEER unit has an MCA of 29. Since I used NM cable and didn't know the exact MCA at the time, I ran #8 cu. Now that I know its 29A MCA and not 31, I could have run #10. If you're putting in a 5 ton and using NM cable, I'd use #8. If you are using a wire that can be used at 75C, then #10 may be OK but I wouldn't go that small if the wire is more than 50' in length.Originally posted by peter d:
Remember that as of January 1st of 2006, all AC units sold will have a minimum efficiency of 13 SEER. With that in mind, you could run a 14/2 and be safe.
This is making an assumption that all units have both the minimum and maximum listed on the nameplate. Not all of them do, so the OCPD can be any size between the MCA and maximum OCPD listed on the unit. Unless of course it does have a specific minimum ampacity as you've mentioned.Originally posted by peter d:
I would offer your very good explanation a slight correction. Our minimum OCPD would have to be based on the size listed on the unit, not the MCA.Originally posted by infinity:
THe OCPD can be any size between the MCA and Maximum OCPD rating on the nameplate.
For instance, I was checking out one of those Trane ultra-efficient units they have on display at Home Depot, and the MCA was 13 amps, and the minimum and maximum OCPD size was 20 amps.
Originally posted by normbac:
Thanks for all replies, guess I have been oversizing ac condensors
That makes no sense at all.Originally posted by suemarkp:
My 4 Ton 14 SEER unit has an MCA of 29.