Jecoelectric
Member
- Location
- Anacortes,WA. 98221
Wiring a detached storage garage, the owners will probably not cover the walls with drywall or plywood, do I need to protect the wiring. The nmb is run through studs to boxes.
I feel like i read an article with a 1/4 in of material covering exposed nm.
Im curious as to why a different wiring method wouldnt be chosen.
Sent from my LGLS770 using Tapatalk
Other structures permitted to be of Types III, IV, and V construction. Cables shall be concealed within walls, floors, or ceilings that provide a thermal barrier of material that has at least a 15-minute finish rating as identified in listings of fire-rated assemblies.
Type NM cable shall be permitted as follows:
For both exposed and concealed work in normally dry locations except as prohibited in 334.10(3)
To have 15 minute finish rating I think you pretty much need at least 1/2 inch drywall, but this does not apply to dwellings or dwelling accessory buildings. If non dwelling and there is no drywall - NM cable is probably not allowed.You are correct. I was tip toeing around the material type but sheetrock kept coming to mind.
Sent from my LGLS770 using Tapatalk
Don't forget the material costs. MC or AC is not permitted where subject to physical damage either so it wouldn't make much difference to the AHJ if he wanted it protected. I only had one inspector in my area ask that it be covered up to 4'. Even then he passed the job and said it was up to the HO. (Kind of funny he said he didn't care if they covered it with cardboard or stuffed insulation in there. Didn't need anything else.)You may want to think beyond the code; think real life:
Garage: ladders, garden tools, etc.
Lots of things get swung around, and NM is not protected against any of them.
I would sell the customer on doing the wiring in MC or AC.
Lots of resi guys don't like working in anything other than NM, but you can always mark up the labor proportionally to the effort, as long as you explain the benefits of armored cable in the garage.
Yep.I may run EMT in such a situation - especially if not planning to cover walls. I can make a run around a small garage faster then I can drill all the holes to pull NM cable through - and use the raceway as EGC so save some copper cost. Multiple circuits - all pull through same raceway. Cost difference may not really be that much compared to NM. For those that never bend pipe though it may seem like a big deal.
Subject to physical damage is always a relative determination. Armored cable can withstand more abuse than NM before being damaged, but do inspectors see it that way? Definitely run pipe in a garage in which the owner parks a Cat' D3...Pipe it. Then you know it will be pretty safe. ...
Even RMC is subject to damage in that case as well as any wiring methods that are concealed.Definitely run pipe in a garage in which the owner parks a Cat' D3...![]()
That was the point. :happyyes:Even RMC is subject to damage in that case as well as any wiring methods that are concealed.
I myself would say most anything in the way is subject to damageThat was the point. :happyyes:
But would an inspector view running NM as more subject to physical damage in such a case?
Wiring a detached storage garage, the owners will probably not cover the walls with drywall or plywood, do I need to protect the wiring. The nmb is run through studs to boxes.
I considered running the nm up to the top of the studs and nailing to the top plate compliant. I also think that following the stud down to the outlet box is compliant. Personally I would run the wire in the attic above and thru a hole at the top in case someone wants to sheetrock later.
As others have said this is an authority having jurisdiction call