Y splitter in data center

Status
Not open for further replies.
I lease space at a data center and have a UL-rated twist-lock Y-splitter on a 20 amp circuit routing electricity into two PDU's in a data center. Why? Because my customer requires two power strips (both running at no more than 8 amps each).

The building landlord told me it was a fire hazard, and I had to remove the Y-splitter as it violated the NEC. Their claim is that Y-SPlitters "are defined under the national electric code as "temporary power". Temporary power is only authorized for a period of time long enough to provision the space with the necessary permanent power."

Is this true?
Y.jpg

http://www.monkeybrains.net/~rudy/images/Y.jpg

Another note, the company, GNi, does not seem interested in running another circuit for us due to cooling concerns and their building limit of restricting power to 65W/square foot. (we currently have 8 20 amp circuits all at 80% in 6 telco racks).

Thanks for answers,
Rudy
 
We had an entire thread on this subject recently (cue George running off to find the thread). Y-splitters are a common method of providing power to rack mounted servers.

However, I've never seen them used in the manner described. Typically in a server installation a rack mounted PDU is supplied from premises wiring and the Y-cables (which may have more than 2 female ends) are run from the PDU to the servers.
 
I read you other post, Tallgirl, and in fact was wondering what to do with the small gauge splitters your talked about. I thought about it and I had installed it the same way noted in your diagram. Phew!
 
rururudy said:
The building landlord told me it was a fire hazard, and I had to remove the Y-splitter as it violated the NEC. Their claim is that Y-SPlitters "are defined under the national electric code as "temporary power". Temporary power is only authorized for a period of time long enough to provision the space with the necessary permanent power."

These are the same people that prohibit power strips because of "fire codes". AFAIC, it's a listed product used in a manner consistent with that listing. Unless the landlord can come with either a citation or a notice of violation from an AHJ, I'd leave it.

Just for fun, you might want to read section the temp power sections (525/527?, the book's at home).

Of course, YMMV.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top