zwave and AFCI tripping issues

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aharland27

Member
Location
Littleton MA
Occupation
Electrician
I need some perspective or advice. I have a customer who got their basement finished by another electrician. There are 3 rooms; in each room, the lighting and outlets are tied together. The customer is having AFCI tripping issues in all of the three rooms, but one room is worse than the others. Every switch is a zwave and the whole space is automated. I typically troubleshoot arc faults with a Siemens Intelli Arc tester and I have had good results with that tester. My readings fluctuate dramatically when the zwave devices are tied in. If I bypass the zwave, the readings seem to settle down. But there is no one thing on any of the circuits that is the obvious problem. All grounds and neutrals are isolated, overall the installing electrician did a decent job other than not separating the lighting from the outlets. Anyone have issues with zwave and arc faults?
 

hbiss

EC, Westchester, New York NEC: 2014
Location
Hawthorne, New York NEC: 2014
Occupation
EC
Your problem is undoubtedly caused by the zwave carrier. It's well known that RF, particularly from 2-way radios or nearby transmitters, can trip a whole panel of arc faults at once. I would keep the zwave as far away from the panel as possible.

Beyond that, about all you can do is make sure you have the latest version of the arc faults. If you can, get rid of them.

By the way, I wouldn't trust that Siemens Intelli Arc tester as far as I could throw it. Ant it looks to be discontinued. Many arc faults have their own diagnostics now (for whatever it's worth).

-Hal
 
  • Like
Reactions: djd

synchro

Senior Member
Location
Chicago, IL
Occupation
EE
Just a few questions to stir things up a bit and maybe stimulate some other responses:

Did the AFCIs ever trip while you were there?
Did the customer or you ever ever observe a light go out due to an AFCI trip without having touched a zwave device immediately beforehand?
Are the receptacles daisy-chained using back-stabbed connections?
 

Aharland27

Member
Location
Littleton MA
Occupation
Electrician
I appreciate the input. It appears to be related to zwave for sure, the devices are not near the panel, so I’m still a bit puzzled. As for the tester, I don’t disagree with you, but it’s a tool in the tool box. Any recommendations on a better Afci tracer?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Aharland27

Member
Location
Littleton MA
Occupation
Electrician
Synchro, the customer claims it happens when no one is even down there, or all the lights are off while they are watching a movie etc. I did not see it trip while I was there. The outlets are daisy chained, but not backstabbed. I know that I need to separate the lighting from the outlets, the installer put everything on together.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

mopowr steve

Senior Member
Location
NW Ohio
Occupation
Electrical contractor
You don’t have to separate the lights from the receptacle outlets. Why do you think they have to? Unless they’re SABC circuits.
Still gotta love them afci’s, in the past they’ve nuisance tripped for me on brand new vacuum cleaners, plasma tv’s, fan speed controls which were not even associated with the circuit at hand.
 

hbiss

EC, Westchester, New York NEC: 2014
Location
Hawthorne, New York NEC: 2014
Occupation
EC
Any recommendations on a better Afci tracer?

No such thing. Make use of any diagnostics but just keep in mind that 99% of the time, if normal troubleshooting doesn't work you can blame it on the AFCI design.

We had a guy awhile back with AFCI breakers tripping for no reason in both a main panel and sub panel. Gave him everything to try, nothing worked. I don't believe we ever heard back from him. I suspect he ripped them out but didn't want to say so here.

-Hal
 

Aharland27

Member
Location
Littleton MA
Occupation
Electrician
Do y’all think that separating the lights and outlets may help? It’s almost as if the AFCI is in the verge on tripping with all the zwave and having anything plugged in may be tipping the scales. The breakers have been replaced multiple times and still trip. I hate these breakers, but there’s gotta be a way to get them to hold


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

hillbilly1

Senior Member
Location
North Georgia mountains
Occupation
Owner/electrical contractor
Not familiar with the Z waves, but do they require a neutral? If not, they probably self power with a very small current to ground. (Similar to the older self powered motion sensors) Enough total leakage may cause the ground fault portion of the afci to trip, especially if there are other unknown leakages.
 

Sierrasparky

Senior Member
Location
USA
Occupation
Electrician ,contractor
I would agree with hillbilly, if these zwave devices do not have neutrals then they are probably using current to ground, too many on a circuit can cause problems with AFCI devices that have ground fault circuits.

Try using a regular beaker and a AFCI receptacle in its place. just temporarily place in panel . The Zwave signal itself should not cause a breaker to trip, very low strength.
 

anthonysolino

Senior Member
No such thing. Make use of any diagnostics but just keep in mind that 99% of the time, if normal troubleshooting doesn't work you can blame it on the AFCI design.

We had a guy awhile back with AFCI breakers tripping for no reason in both a main panel and sub panel. Gave him everything to try, nothing worked. I don't believe we ever heard back from him. I suspect he ripped them out but didn't want to say so here.

-Hal
I just came from a place where I had people argue with me to the moon and back about AFCI's and how they DONT help safety in the home, what are your thoughts, I don't want to talk about tripping and all of that I have my opinions on that topic, i'm a huge proponent of these devices, I think they save lives and property
 

Knuckle Dragger

Master Electrician Electrical Contractor 01752
Location
Marlborough, Massachusetts USA
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
I have installed a lot of afci circuit breakers On remodels with AC wiring circa 1920-30's that I do and have not had any real issues. I saw one function properly on a service call I did.
The homeowner had done the wiring and installed an afci circuit breaker.
But the circuit looped through all the receptacles on the first and second floors that were feeding three AC window units plus general lighting in general purpose receptacles.
The call was at the afci circuit breaker was tripping all the time after it was reset.
when I got there the circuit breaker wasn't tripped anymore but I had found that the circuit open at a receptacle the conductors were burned clear of the terminals.
I guess the AFCI worked but he kept reseting the CB.
 

hbiss

EC, Westchester, New York NEC: 2014
Location
Hawthorne, New York NEC: 2014
Occupation
EC
I just came from a place where I had people argue with me to the moon and back about AFCI's and how they DONT help safety in the home, what are your thoughts, I don't want to talk about tripping and all of that I have my opinions on that topic, i'm a huge proponent of these devices, I think they save lives and property

If you read the pages of comments on AFCIs here, most of us agree with whoever you were arguing with. But not only do we have engineers and other qualified people with credentials who have researched AFCIs from the day they were conceived, we have the evidence to back it up. Read about how the NEC was infiltrated by the manufacturers so they could have guaranteed sales. Read about the bogus UL testing method used to certify AFCIs, and how AFCIs can't detect one of the most common ways receptacles and connections can overheat.

Sure, you'll find one that tripped once and a while from what seems to be a fault, but have you ever seen any verifiable proof that they have saved even one life or prevented one fire? That's because there is none, only skewed, biased data from manufacturer's and other parties who have a vested interest to make the public think what you do- and keep buying their product.

Class action lawsuits have been tried but never went forward because the huge manufacturers like SQ D, Siemans, etc. have too much at stake and much deeper pockets for lawyers. They know that a legal win would be devastating and could put some out of business. So if they have nothing to hide, why are they so afraid?

-Hal
 

hbiss

EC, Westchester, New York NEC: 2014
Location
Hawthorne, New York NEC: 2014
Occupation
EC
I should also add that there is no recourse or alternative when all diagnostic and troubleshooting avenues have been exhausted and the AFCIs you installed keep nuisance tripping. Not only is the EC liable in the eyes of the customer and risks getting paid or wasting time on service calls, the EC is liable by law if they remove the AFCIs and replace them with something else. I think this is the major cause of blow back and bad rep for AFCIs in this trade.

Really, I for one, couldn't give a darn whether or not they detect arc faults as long as they trip on overload and don't nuisance trip which costs me money and reputation.

I have a sneaking suspicion that the manufacturers in recent years have "dumbed down" AFCIs to be less sensitive to supposed arc signatures in order to mitigate nuisance tripping. I mean, really, who's to know? There is no way for us to test them. Then the bad taste in our mouths goes away, the AFCIs become painless and they stand to sell more. Watch for them to creep into commercial like is happening with GFCIs now.

-Hal
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top