120V

Status
Not open for further replies.

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
It may be overloaded................

Which part of this gets overloaded?

120VSupply01.jpg


It's a 120V supply, regardless of source, with 120V loads?
What am I missing?
If I've got it wrong or drawn it wrongly, perhaps you could reciprocate with a drawing of what I should be looking at?
 
T

T.M.Haja Sahib

Guest
Which part of this gets overloaded?

120VSupply01.jpg


It's a 120V supply, regardless of source, with 120V loads?
What am I missing?
If I've got it wrong or drawn it wrongly, perhaps you could reciprocate with a drawing of what I should be looking at?

Sorry.My assistants have left a short while ago and so it is difficult for me to upload a diagram.
My suggestion is you please take a mirror image of your diagram,merge the 'B' lines into one and designate it as 'N' (i.e neutral).The 'A' designates phase wire from 120V source. Now you have got a pseudo MWBC.You can easily see the neutral will be overloaded in this circuit.......
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
My suggestion is you please take a mirror image of your diagram,merge the 'B' lines into one and designate it as 'N' (i.e neutral).The 'A' designates phase wire from 120V source. Now you have got a pseudo MWBC.You can easily see the neutral will be overloaded in this circuit.......


So if you change the drawing entirely you can show the neutral as subject to overload.

Fascinating point.



Just another thread taken off track by TM. :roll:
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
You misunderstood me.Two phase wires from the same 120V phase but single neutral wire.Loading this circuit as if it were a MWBC would cause overloading of neutral.

By definition it is not an MWBC if supplied from the same phases, however I do understand what you are trying to say.

If the person installing it is unqualified and does not provide over current protection as required the neutral is subject to overload.
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
Sorry.My assistants have left a short while ago and so it is difficult for me to upload a diagram.
My suggestion is you please take a mirror image of your diagram,merge the 'B' lines
Single phase 120V circuit. Two wires. Thee are no B lines to be merged together.
How can that simple 120V circuit result in one of the two conductors being overloaded.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
Sorry.My assistants have left a short while ago and so it is difficult for me to upload a diagram.
My suggestion is you please take a mirror image of your diagram,merge the 'B' lines into one and designate it as 'N' (i.e neutral).The 'A' designates phase wire from 120V source. Now you have got a pseudo MWBC.You can easily see the neutral will be overloaded in this circuit.......

If the supply is a two lead source technically there is no neutral.

If the supply is a 3 lead 120/240m source and you are only using one lead plus neutral you still have same thing at this panel for all practical purposes of this discussion.

If this panel is supplied by a feeder there is no way to overload anything if proper ovefrcurrent protection is applied to the feeder.

If this panel is supplied by a service (which the OP says "non-service rated panel" so that would be a problem right there) you would need the grounded conductor to have the sum of the ampacity of the two ungrounded conductor ampacities to prevent overloading.

Have done this many times on farms where supplying some outbuilding with 120 volt only and limited loads like two circuits only.

Lets say we only have two 20 amp circuits - the grounded conductor needs to be at least 40 amps, the ungrounded conductors can be only 20 amps if running two of them otherwise 40 amps if running a single conductor.

If you are supplying a 100 amp panel with two 100 amp capacity ungrounded conductors you will need a 200 amp grounded conductor, in most cases you should also seriously consider making this 120/240 if there is any way possible.

Most of the time when this is done it is in places where the load is somewat minimal.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
I've seen it done for some water trough heaters in large cattle feedlot. Triplex ran overhead to two circuit cans with individual breakers for each water trough heater. All 120v.

What's the problem?

Exactly one application I described in my previous post and have seen many times.
 

Little Bill

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Tennessee NEC:2017
Occupation
Semi-Retired Electrician
Ignorant Brit again.
Why is using one leg as the neutral bad?

As I recall, they were using 2-pole breakers. Hot on 1 pole and neutral on the other. If someone else worked in the panel and didn't know how it was set up they could easily be confused, especially if they tried to connect a 240V load. Also you would have to be careful to land the correct neutral with each hot on the 2-pole breaker. And you can't have white wires on the breakers without re-identifying them. In this case, re-identifying them would be wrong since they are not ungrounded conductors.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
As hurk27 has, I've heard of 60/120 center tapped stuff. I don't believe though you can simply jumper the bus together of a standard 1 phase panel a still be compliant as you could end up with 200% on the neutral. Seems like I saw a publication on this somewhere.
Assuming the feeder grounded and ungrounded conductors are the same size and assuming all of the branch circuits are two wire circuits there is no neutral loading issue.

Other than the possible issue of more than one conductor in the line side termination point in the panel I don't see any NEC issues with doing this.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
And you can't have white wires on the breakers without re-identifying them. In this case, re-identifying them would be wrong since they are not ungrounded conductors.
What says you can't have white wires on breakers that are switching the grounded conductor? They are still grounded conductors. There is at least one code section that requires the breaker to disconnect both the hot and neutral conductor and the whites are landed on that breaker.
 

resistance

Senior Member
Location
WA
I've seen it done for some water trough heaters in large cattle feedlot. Triplex ran overhead to two circuit cans with individual breakers for each water trough heater. All 120v.

What's the problem?
[With the source being 120/240]Does that make sense to you—if a person intentionally runs a 2 wire feed with ground to intentionally serve a non service rated panel @ 120v only??? Goodness, I hope not!! Doesn’t it make since to run a 3 wire feed with ground? This seems to be unprofessional to me. Meaning: something a DIY’er would do! Or a cheap electrical contractor. Why would anyone deliberately bid a job this way!
 
Last edited:

rcwilson

Senior Member
Location
Redmond, WA
A common application is distribution for a 120 Volt single phase UPS output. Hot, Neutral and Ground, with neutral bonded to ground in the UPS or the Bypass Transformer. (The UPS could be bought with a 120/240V output but it was supplied with a 120V output winding.)

The UPS output goes to a standard distribution panel, 120 V, single phase with a neutral bus, isolated ground bus and EGC bus. The two hot busses are jumpered together so any breaker postion supplies 120V.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
[With the source being 120/240]Does that make sense to you?if a person intentionally runs a 2 wire feed with ground to intentionally serve a non service rated panel @ 120v only??? Goodness, I hope not!! Doesn?t it make since to run a 3 wire feed with ground? This seems to be unprofessional to me. Meaning: something a DIY?er would do! Or a cheap electrical contractor. Why would anyone deliberately bid a job this way!

If load is limited as in the example both Cow and myself had with the drinking water tank heaters for livestock there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. Two wire feed instead of three (plus EGC of course) In feed yards there may be lot of length to the feed, yet a little voltage drop is rather insignificant so you don't worry about increasing conductor size much for that.
 

resistance

Senior Member
Location
WA
If load is limited as in the example both Cow and myself had with the drinking water tank heaters for livestock there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. Two wire feed instead of three (plus EGC of course) In feed yards there may be lot of length to the feed, yet a little voltage drop is rather insignificant so you don't worry about increasing conductor size much for that.
IC.
 
Last edited:

texie

Senior Member
Location
Fort Collins, Colorado
Occupation
Electrician, Contractor, Inspector
Assuming the feeder grounded and ungrounded conductors are the same size and assuming all of the branch circuits are two wire circuits there is no neutral loading issue.

Other than the possible issue of more than one conductor in the line side termination point in the panel I don't see any NEC issues with doing this.

Duh....what was I thinking? You're right, guess I didn't think that thru to well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top