Ok guys, since there seems to be a lack of clarity/understanding on some of the finer points I have raised on THIS THREAD'S DISCUSSION I have decided to create a poll:
Here's the scenario:
Two makers of CFL's with identical wattage, light output and rated life offer their wares. One of them has a propensity to end it's life with smoke or melting/burning plastic, the other does not.
The one that doesn't end it's life with smoke or melting costs exactly $1 more than the one that does.
Which one would you buy and/or recommend to your customers?
Which one would you yourself purchase again after experiencing it's end of life cycle?
Here's the scenario:
Two makers of CFL's with identical wattage, light output and rated life offer their wares. One of them has a propensity to end it's life with smoke or melting/burning plastic, the other does not.
The one that doesn't end it's life with smoke or melting costs exactly $1 more than the one that does.
Which one would you buy and/or recommend to your customers?
Which one would you yourself purchase again after experiencing it's end of life cycle?