Among the things I am saying is: If you can't quantify the spec, then it is likely not a good candidate for an NEC rule. Consider IR scans? Sure - design decision.iwire said:... all I am saying is IR scans are something to consider and I do not have a lower limit. ...
Okay - so what? If the OSHA required clearances are not there, don't do them. OSHA issue, not NECiwire said:... One of my coworkers spends a lot of time doing IR scans of electrical systems in many types of occupancies. stores, factories, office buildings, health care buildings etc. ...
Another good reason why, after the minimums are met, the rest are design decisions.iwire said:I think that 110.26 is very subjective and we can not really provide a national answer to what it covers and does not cover. ...
True. And I think it is a problem when one has an inspector making calls based on, "life experiences" instead of technical reasoning.iwire said:... It's a real word out there and inspectors do have to make judgment calls with many code sections. ...
As we all know, the NEC is a permissive - if it doesn't say "no" its okay to do. If the NEC is nebulous on a certain subject, then I suggest the AHJ publish a minimum spec - that way, it doesn't change by the job.
carl