As a follow up to the 700.9(B) thread I did send a question to the Panel Members which consisted of Vince Saporita, (CMP 11) David Mercier, (CMP 7 Alt) John Minick, (Retired CMP member) Mark Ode, (TCC Alt, CMP 3 Alt, and CMP 4) Jim Carpenter (TCC Chair, although he gave his seat on the panel to Keith Lofland) Keith Lofland, (director of education, codes and standards for IAEI International) Mark Earley, (see pages 9 and 20 of the NEC and the cover of the NECH) Richard Loyd, (CMP 8) and Alan Manche (CMP 10).
Here is the question I sent in.
As Dennis stated here the question went to Vince Saporita, who said at first he was going to answer no but, after discussing it with some other panel members, (he specifically stated John Minick and Mark Ode) he answered yes, it does meet the requirement of being Entirely Independent.
There were no objections from any of the other panel members
Roger
Here is the question I sent in.
Considering the term "entirely independent" as used in 517.30(C)(1), 517.41(D), and 700.9(B), does permanent barriers installed in a surface metallic raceway, underfloor metallic raceway, or any other equipment meet the requirement of being "entirely independent" when other wiring systems are installed in the other compartments?
As Dennis stated here the question went to Vince Saporita, who said at first he was going to answer no but, after discussing it with some other panel members, (he specifically stated John Minick and Mark Ode) he answered yes, it does meet the requirement of being Entirely Independent.
There were no objections from any of the other panel members
Roger