I thought that is what I said ??:-?Dennis Alwon said:M.D. I think that silver cord goes to the lighted mirror on the counter.
iwire said:First off 400.8(1) and (7) are irrelevant as this installation is specifically permitted by 400.7(A)(9).
Next I find it interesting you can tell from this picture that the cord is subject to damage.
Lets say I have a commercial electric overhead door.
Lets say it has a reversing safety edge on the bottom of it.
What wiring method may I use to connect the door that may move 8' 10' 12' up and down to the stationary motor operator?
Of course flexible cord.
Is the cord in the drawer more subject to damage then the rubber cord hanging beside a overhead door?
Again not relevant.
The NEC does not require a cord to be visible their entire length.
Your right no method in Chapter 3 is suitable for this use.
Some of the flexible cords in Article 400 are suitable for this use.
It's not about how we feel about it, it is about what the code does or does not require.
M. D. said:I have changed my opinion I am with Pierre on this one . That cord is not a wiring method and it is being used as one .
Premises Wiring (System). That interior and exterior wiring, including power, lighting, control, and signal circuit wiring together with all their associated hardware, fittings, and wiring devices, both permanently and temporarily installed, that extends from the service point or source of power, such as a battery, a solar photovoltaic system, or a generator, transformer, or converter windings, to the outlet(s). Such wiring does not include wiring internal to appliances, luminaires (fixtures), motors, controllers, motor control centers, and similar equipment.
georgestolz said:If this is plugged into a receptacle, then I do not see how it could be considered "substituting for the fixed wiring of a structure."