090606-1446 EST
ELA:
I also agree it would be a large percentage of modulation. Even though I suggested this as a possibility I do not think it is the source. It may well be a phantom created by the instrument.
My point of the reference was that the ratio of sidebands to carrier can be influenced by the amount of carrier that is removed.
15 Hz is a subharmonic of 45, 60, and 75. 45 and 75 have no harmonic relation to 60.
Since the 45 and 75 components diminish as the instrument is move away from the circuit, and I assume the 60 does as well, then we can assume it comes from the circuit electric field. Therefore, scope picture of 6 cycles should allow us to see any substantial modulation of the signal.
There has to be something very wrong in the basic waveform to generate large components at 45 and 75. I think it is an error introduced in the instrument.
fields5491:
I consider my supply voltage to be rather stable, and it varies more than your logged data.
I have four plots of it for short times shown at photos P22- P25 at
www.beta-a2.com/EE-photos.html.
This data is from 1 second samples. Voltage is quantizied to 0.1 V, and power to 10 W.
Your logged data has no correlation with a 15 Hz signal.
As ELA stated the modulation of 60 Hz probably needs to be large for you to see sideband components. Is your vertical scale log or linear? What is the design of the pickup element in your EMF instrument (transducer -- antenna -- capacitor)?
.