New Sub Panel

Status
Not open for further replies.

tryinghard

Senior Member
Location
California
You seem to be stuck, the OPs situation had no parallel paths, no multiple connections from neutral to earth therefore no 'objectionable current' for 250.6 to address.

The OP's sub panels white, green, & bare wires are terminated together the same as if a service disconnect, not an assumption, - this causes objectionable current issues hence 250.6 (parallel paths). That is why 250.142(B) & 250.24(A)(5) exist. I'm more stuck on the reasons of applying 250.142(B) & 250.24(A)(5)! If these two codes are violated parallel paths will occur (Objectionable Current).
 

jxofaltrds

Inspector Mike®
Location
Mike P. Columbus Ohio
Occupation
ESI, PI, RBO
The OP's sub panels white, green, & bare wires are terminated together the same as if a service disconnect, not an assumption, - this causes objectionable current issues hence 250.6 (parallel paths). That is why 250.142(B) & 250.24(A)(5) exist. I'm more stuck on the reasons of applying 250.142(B) & 250.24(A)(5)! If these two codes are violated parallel paths will occur (Objectionable Current).

Try to think of this like a home with a detached garage.
 

tryinghard

Senior Member
Location
California
Not busting your chops but what is an "uncontrolled path"?

The path current travels other than through the grounded conductor (neutral), in this case the unbalance load. There?s no control for this objectionable current it is not flowing solely on the intended conductor path. Chops are fine [smile]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top