gfci protection not required over bath tub

Merry Christmas
Status
Not open for further replies.

tommyrice

Member
can anyone explain to me why the code does not require gfci protection for a recessed light listed for a damp or wet location over a bath tub or shower 410.10(D),and does require gfci prot. for a recessed light over a hot tub or spa 680.43(B)(1).to my way of thinking both types of tubs present a hazard associated with people standing in water and maybe in the case of a damaged recessed light being subjected to a shock or electrocution hazard.I don't think the fact that a spa or hot tub having a motor and a bath tub not having a motor should preclude a bath tub or shower not having gfci prot. for recessed lights within 7.6 feet or 8 feet above the outline of the tub or shower.
 
So a light has an egc and is located over a shower and you think that it is a hazard? Obviously there has not been documentation of this install being a problem. Hot tubs have different requirements then hydromassage tubs. Hot tubs have chemicals which makes the water more conductive then bath tub water. Most people cannot reach the trim on a can that is 8' high.
 
There is a RC can that allows open trim with a par lamp so long as it is GFCI protected in a shower I don't recall the brand.
 
Actually most fan/lights req. gfci if installed over a shower but there are some cans that also req. it-- most do not.

Also, all recessed cans can have an open bulb over a shower if it is rated for damp location and it is more than 8' over the rim of the shower or tub.

I install open bulbs in cans over hydromassage tubs all the time- no shower so height doesn't matter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top