why when adjusting ampicity because of ambient temprature or sum of current carrying conductor we use 90 c column with thhn or thwn insulation although the conductor we have might have different insulation
why when adjusting ampicity because of ambient temprature or sum of current carrying conductor we use 90 c column with thhn or thwn insulation although the conductor we have might have different insulation
why when adjusting ampicity because of ambient temprature or sum of current carrying conductor we use 90 c column with thhn or thwn insulation although the conductor we have might have different insulation
For THHN/THWN you would use the 75? C ampacity in a wet location unless the conductor were also marked THWN-2.
That only applies if you are using the conductors in a wet location. THHN without the -2 is suitable for 90?C use in dry locations.Strictly speaking you only use the 90C column if the wire is THHN-2 or THWN-2, or something else with '-2' at the end, or something else that otherwise appears in the 90C column. ...
The THWN without the -2 is listed for 75?C in wet locations and 90?C in dry locations. See Table 310.13(A) in the 2008 code or 310.104(A) in the 2011.Can I ask why? Why does wet location change the de-rating column?
Also, I'm pretty sure THWN is rated for wet locations I was told that is what the "W" stood for. So if it is rated for wet locations why would you have to de-rate from a lower column?
Thanks Mike
If you don't know the answer to my question, it's all right.![]()
Can I ask why? Why does wet location change the de-rating column?
Also, I'm pretty sure THWN is rated for wet locations I was told that is what the "W" stood for. So if it is rated for wet locations why would you have to de-rate from a lower column?
Thanks Mike
why when adjusting ampicity because of ambient temprature or sum of current carrying conductor we use 90 c column with thhn or thwn insulation although the conductor we have might have different insulation