Are we wrong to assume alcohol is involved? Or that "bad publicity" must follow?
Writing from a Reno, Nv., perspective ....
Bars are for more than just getting drunk. Here in Reno, one in particular had a reputation for having darn good fried chicken, and folks often socialized there without drinking anything stronger than cola. This, btw, was a true "bar" and had NO tables- just the counter.
Likewise, especially on payday, many folks will go to the place of their choice and play a modest amount (say, $20) in the video poker machine. They'll play as long as they can, chat up their friends, drink the free beverages (again, they might not contain alcohol), and then go home.
Finally, I often see crews from the larger employers to use a local watering hole as a place to meet up and co-ordinate activities. OK, so these are usually utility crews .... but the PoCo doesn't seem to have a public relations problem with this.
In closing, I really object to a mentality that starts off from the premise that something wrong is happening, then expects a case for innocence to be made. That's not what we're all about. Even 'having a drink' is NOT 'drinking and driving.' Not even close. For all the nanny-state drivel over "drunk driving," somehow millions of folks manage to remain sober. "Demon Rum" is propaganda put out by the "religious" competition.
Posted by a non-drinker. By choice- without any moral baggage.