gar
Senior Member
- Location
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Occupation
- EE
150126-2117 EST
Have you noticed how badly distorted some phone signals are today? Recently my daughter got an I-phone 6, and dropped her home phone line. Most of the time she is nearly ununderstandable. This change was to get rid of their AT&T home land line. Now she is down to only one land line for business purposes. This one land line is for voice quality and system reliability purposes. My daughter, her husband, and my grand-daughter are all on T-mobile.
I am on Verizon and so is my son. I recently got rid of my AT&T home land line, and an AT&T leased line providing DSL service and replaced these with Comcast Internet and voice phone. The DSL was totally unsatisfactory and phone service was over priced and limited capability for the cost.
My son is not using an I-phone and I have no voice quality problems with him either via cell-to-cell or land-to-land or any combination.
Back in the days of analog cellular voice quality was good. Range was also good I could communicate from a high spot in the Irish Hills (MI) to a tower near Whitmore Lake (MI), about 50 miles.
In the October 2014 "IEEE Spectrum" is a useful article, p 36, on cellphone voice quality problems. My comments above correlate with the discussion in the Spectrum article.
Also in the issue, p 56, is an article on "The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy".
More on voice quality. I find that many TV programs are distorting voice, but much less on AM radio. Probably starting in the late 20s, and certainly by the 30s, improvement in voice quality and reduction of background was an important criteria. WWJ in Detroit had their broadcast studio shock mounted from the building to remove outside noise and vibration. Also the room was sound deadened. This was possibly a 100 seat auditorium. Since those days it appears that sound quality has been downgraded for some reason, possibly listeners don't care.
.
Have you noticed how badly distorted some phone signals are today? Recently my daughter got an I-phone 6, and dropped her home phone line. Most of the time she is nearly ununderstandable. This change was to get rid of their AT&T home land line. Now she is down to only one land line for business purposes. This one land line is for voice quality and system reliability purposes. My daughter, her husband, and my grand-daughter are all on T-mobile.
I am on Verizon and so is my son. I recently got rid of my AT&T home land line, and an AT&T leased line providing DSL service and replaced these with Comcast Internet and voice phone. The DSL was totally unsatisfactory and phone service was over priced and limited capability for the cost.
My son is not using an I-phone and I have no voice quality problems with him either via cell-to-cell or land-to-land or any combination.
Back in the days of analog cellular voice quality was good. Range was also good I could communicate from a high spot in the Irish Hills (MI) to a tower near Whitmore Lake (MI), about 50 miles.
In the October 2014 "IEEE Spectrum" is a useful article, p 36, on cellphone voice quality problems. My comments above correlate with the discussion in the Spectrum article.
Also in the issue, p 56, is an article on "The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy".
More on voice quality. I find that many TV programs are distorting voice, but much less on AM radio. Probably starting in the late 20s, and certainly by the 30s, improvement in voice quality and reduction of background was an important criteria. WWJ in Detroit had their broadcast studio shock mounted from the building to remove outside noise and vibration. Also the room was sound deadened. This was possibly a 100 seat auditorium. Since those days it appears that sound quality has been downgraded for some reason, possibly listeners don't care.
.