yesJust to be clear, the main disconnect is in the panel?
If that is the case the inspector really ought to be made to understand why he is wrong.
Correctamundo.wouldn"t this be parallel neutrals and be not code compliant?
Just to be clear, the main disconnect is in the panel?
If that is the case the inspector really ought to be made to understand why he is wrong.
Exactly that's why the inspector is incorrect.wouldn"t this be parallel neutrals and be not code compliant?
huh?Couldn't the inspector just enforce this as a City Code as long as it was treated like a sub panel?
Only if it's a formal amendment and even it it were it would be a stupid amendment.Couldn't the inspector just enforce this as a City Code as long as it was treated like a sub panel?
I agree, why would you want to parallel a #3 and a #6 conductor?Only if it's a formal amendment and even it it were it would be a stupid amendment.
Roger
If the inspector thinks the panel in this discussion is a sub panel he is dumber than we originally thought he was.He maybe calling the #6 ground your fourth wire. Totally separated at sub panel from neutral and bonded at main.
LOL.If the inspector thinks the panel in this discussion is a sub panel he is dumber than we originally thought he was.
Roger
Are you saying inspectors in your area are not licensed and are not required to have continuing education?You never know what goes through a inspectors mind other than job legitimacy
Just like home inspectors when selling a house. No degree required.