In logic, the condition "a or b or c" is interpreted as an inclusive or. It is satisfied by a, b, c, ab, ac, bc, and abc.
Another way of stating it is that you must satisfy at least one of the choices a, b, and c.
Sometimes the nature of a, b, and c is such that it is not possible to satisfy more than one of them at a time. But it would be the nature of the conditions, not the "or"
In ordinary language, a or b or c will be used in either the inclusive or exclusive (pick only one) sense.
To make it perfectly clear, you can say "at least one of a, b, and c" or "exactly one of a, b, and c."
"Or" by itself does not do the job in ordinary language.
But in logical analysis (foreign to the NEC) the meaning of the unqualified "or" is one or more from the choices.
In practice, if it is possible to satisfy more than one from a, b, and c, it is very unlikely that the Code intends for forbid satisfying more than one.
"Chose one of the following" is pretty clearly exclusive, but the Code never, as far as I know, never uses that language.