wwhitney
Senior Member
- Location
- Berkeley, CA
- Occupation
- Retired
Presumably it's also lighter for a given ampacity. Not sure how flexibility would compare.Cost... that alone is the only reason I know.
Cheers, Wayne
Presumably it's also lighter for a given ampacity. Not sure how flexibility would compare.Cost... that alone is the only reason I know.
Actually I was asking why clad aluminum with copper at all? It doesn't change the ampacity and by implication it doesn't change the resistance, and it cannot be cheaper than unclad aluminum, so why? What am I missing?Cost... that alone is the only reason I know.
I was asking about clad vs unclad aluminum, not clad aluminum vs copper. I could be wrong but I can't imagine that copper clad aluminum could be cheaper than unclad aluminum.Yes cost!!! Even though I don’t know the difference yet lol
I was asking about clad vs unclad aluminum, not clad aluminum vs copper. I could be wrong but I can't imagine that copper clad aluminum could be cheaper than unclad aluminum.
Well I don’t think you can get aluminum in the smaller gauge 14-12-10Actually I was asking why clad aluminum with copper at all? It doesn't change the ampacity and by implication it doesn't change the resistance, and it cannot be cheaper than unclad aluminum, so why? What am I missing?