Read it closely.ah found it! Article 314(C)(2)
I'm not seeing that. I only see that the conduit body must be marked with the volume, and the volume has to be calculated per table 314.16(B).I'm on a bus. Isn't the requirement that the conduit body has more than two entries, or words to that affect? Splices in an LB would not be allowed. Ts, yes. Not that it never happens...
The "two or more entries" rule last appeared as 370-6(b) in the 1990 code.I'm on a bus. Isn't the requirement that the conduit body has more than two entries, or words to that affect? Splices in an LB would not be allowed. Ts, yes. Not that it never happens...
Thank you. That tells my ageThe "two or more entries" rule last appeared as 370-6(b) in the 1990 code.
I just remember mike holt saying this can be done but I always want to see proof such as NEC code reference to back itWhere in the code does it say that you can spice wire in LB ? I know I read some place about cubic inch space . That if it was mark with cubic in that it was ok to spice in LB's.
Remember, the NEC is permissive by default.I just remember mike holt saying this can be done but I always want to see proof such as NEC code reference to back it
I’m yea I don’t fully understand? Are you saying that if they don’t diss allow a practice then it’s permissible?Remember, the NEC is permissive by default.
Yes.I’m yea I don’t fully understand? Are you saying that if they don’t diss allow a practice then it’s permissible?