six73
Member
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Occupation
- Electrical Inspector (ICC E-2)
I have an inspection client (electrician) who's embroiled in a dispute with a property owner and I'm trying to give him some guidance. The root of the problem revolves around a PV install that the PO undertook separately from the work my client has done, without consultation with my client, and neither my client nor I have much experience with those systems. It's not even clear to me that this setup is entirely sensible, so opinions are welcome. In short, my client installed a new service with hardwired generator and ATS, and then at some point the PO went behind and had a PV system installed and now everybody is pointing fingers at each other about who is responsible for what. Nothing is energized currently (maybe the PV system, but utility power hasn't been connected yet for the service).
Question 1: Does the ATS count as the disconnect for the PV install, or should there be a separate disconnect? My gut feeling is that the ATS would not suffice for that, but any competent PV installer (I don't know for a fact that that's what we're dealing with) should handle that as part of their install, right?
Question 2: Which side of the ATS should the PV feed be on? This also seems like something the PV installer should be able to answer, but the situation devolved very quickly and now they're refusing to even speak to my client. Is this something that the utility provider should specify? I am aware of article 705 for interconnected power production systems, but does that apply in this case?
Question 1: Does the ATS count as the disconnect for the PV install, or should there be a separate disconnect? My gut feeling is that the ATS would not suffice for that, but any competent PV installer (I don't know for a fact that that's what we're dealing with) should handle that as part of their install, right?
Question 2: Which side of the ATS should the PV feed be on? This also seems like something the PV installer should be able to answer, but the situation devolved very quickly and now they're refusing to even speak to my client. Is this something that the utility provider should specify? I am aware of article 705 for interconnected power production systems, but does that apply in this case?